To the Editor: Vacating the Floodplain Isn't the Answer to Flooding
Local resident: "Flooding cannot be solved by running away."
Editor's note: This letter was written in response to an article "Plan Proposed for Permanent Flooding Fix," which appeared on Patch March 21.
Ella Filippone, a representative from the Passaic River Coalition recently proposed a plan to solve flooding by simply removing all residents from areas, which flood, using the phrase “vacating the floodplain.” The plan, as described, does not address serious repercussions to the communities in which it would be carried out and the public has a right to know the consequences of what is being proposed.
In Wayne, Pequannock, Riverdale, Pompton Lakes, and beyond, thousands of homes have been affected by flooding. Were these numbers only in the dozens, this case would be much different, but we’re discussing thousands of homes and millions of dollars in assessed property taxes over a 10 year period.
First and foremost, vacating all of these homes is simply not an option as the township governments affected would collapse financially under the burden of the lost tax revenues. The math at hand is fairly basic and anyone considering this option could easily model the data in a way that would reveal this, if they chose to do so.
Presuming that the lost tax revenue were not an obstacle and somehow the remaining township residents could be called upon to pay a massive increase in taxes for the same level of services year in and year out, vacating the floodplain is both inhumane and cruel.
My family has lived in the floodplain for 27 years. We have friends and neighbors who are like an extended family here. For us to leave, for any of them to leave, would be heartbreaking.
Consider that on the scale of thousands of homes. Consider too asking families with young children to pull those kids from the school system and throw them into a new community without any friends, tough enough for an adult, just plain cruel for a child. Those who wish to move away from the flood areas may do so with our blessing, but I just hope they know how much they’ll be missed in the community.
Finally, there are the future families and children of these townships. For those living in the floodplain, paying nearly double for a home of comparable size on the opposite side of the township is simply not an option. To vacate the floodplain would be to lock thousands of budding young families out of their own American Dream, something none of us would ever wish upon ourselves or our children.
Anyone who truly wishes to help remediate flooding, needs to take their voice and their soapbox to Trenton. Make sure lawmakers know that they need to support reservoir management bills, that they need to fund projects to remove accumulated silt and shoals from the riverbed, and that the federal government needs to address the extreme amounts of stormwater that New York state introduces into New Jersey each year without consequence.
Flooding cannot be solved by running away, but only by addressing the problem head on and as a community.
Christopher Lotito
Pequannock, NJ
Victor of Wayne
1:58 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
I am tired of my tax dollars going towards the policing and repairing of homes in the flood zones. Who do they think pays for FEMA? Who do they think pays for the towns to dispose of all their refuse when they tear out there homes. I don't get a new house every year or tow. Why should I pay for theirs. If they had to pay their own way they would never be in the flood zone. Take the buy out or get nothing the next time it floods. And before they say it the taxes they are paying I am sure does not cover the cost for repairing the endless flood damage.
Josie Wanna
7:33 am on Friday, March 30, 2012
Victor clearly you are nothing more than a MORON!! How dare you talk such ill words when these families go through this! Most ppl live in those areas because the homes are cheaper you MORON! and like Dara said it's there insurance that pays not you! All homes in a flood area are required to carry policy's so try again you MORON!! Do you think ppl like getting new home each year and having to displace their children for months at an end? Seriously you bitter old fool think about it before you make such stupid comments. Next flood why don't you bring your body there and see what these ppl go through and especial the children! Then we can talk bc after all you think ppl like there to just have new homes once a year!! You are nothing more than a MORON and trust me there are other words I would love to call an idiot like you. Have a great day :)
Diane Hummel
2:12 pm on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
First of all Victor, I have Flood Insurance that I PAY FOR that covers all of my losses, and I never use YOUR money for anything. As for the town picking up our garbage, I PAY for that as well as you. There is a special place for people like you that criticize us and all that we go through. A new house every year or two is not exactly correct. Think before you speak my friend - I hope you NEVER have to go through what we all have gone through.
Scondo
5:37 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Well victor, it seems as though you have hit upon one of the central arguments of disaster mitigation . There is a school of thought that says providing NFIP through taxpayer subsidy actually promotes the loss of life and property , for if there were no Flood insurance there would be fewer people locating in flood zones, which incidentally includes barrier islands. So there has been some very strong effort to eliminate NFIP altogether in the last several years. The net effect was to weaken the coverage and benefit and raise the cost, but another effort to eliminate it will come from the current congress no doubt.
But more importantly Victor, you have replaced me as the most villified person on Patch. Thanks , I appreciate it. Although my replacing Rob was a good run, I hand off the spot to you, hope you have a good run.
Scondo
11:45 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-08-25-flood-insurance_N.htm
This point has been raised in the past.
Dara
9:46 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012
Victor so sad to hear that someone feels the way you do. In order to have our homes fixed, it gets paid by the insurance policy that you carry when you live in the flood zone. Not everyone in the flood zone gets hit by the floods all the time. Many people this year were not in the flood zone and got water in their homes. The difference is they dont have flood insurance. There are many things that happen in a town that doesnt affect the whole town, yet our tax dollars are going toward paying it. For example; many seniors are paying taxes at the same rate, as a family that has multiple children and they dont reap the benefit of the educational tax dollars that are being spent on their behalf. Lets not forget that social security will probably pay out more than a person has paid in, if they live a long life. Is it fair that when a home is bought out that the community has to absorb that tax liability for the rest of time? Community is about sharing the risk and rewards. I am truely sorry that you feel the way you do, maybe you should live on an island alone so that your only responsibility is you. For now i will do what i can to helpothers while im helping myself.
John Lynch
8:46 am on Friday, March 30, 2012
Josie and Dara well said.
lovethetunes
9:41 am on Friday, March 30, 2012
Ratio should be long-term cost to the community per flood event vs. cost of keeping the home there. Also another issue is that some of the homes built in flood area should have never been built there in the first place. Our natural filtration we once had is gone. I say do buy-outs in steps - targeting hardest hit areas first. As for elevation, something to think about - you still have to get in and out of your home, the amount stairs could be a problem for seniors and others and also what about the fact of putting our emergency personnel at jeopardy in these serious weather conditions. Usually from what I know with FEMA buy-outs a community is paid the loss of property taxes for ten years.
bill wolfe
11:44 am on Friday, March 30, 2012
A comprehensive solution is in order - along the lines of the Farm Resettlement Administration created during the Dust Bowl and Depression - see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resettlement_Administration
Homeowner and renter repurchase and relocation assistance, transition economic aide to towns suffering tax loss, and a complete moratorium on new development in vegetated areas of the watershed and floodplain would be key steps.
We need active government!
Rob Burke
5:41 pm on Friday, March 30, 2012
Does anyone know how much the Willowbrook Mall pays in real estate taxes to the Town? With the Mall now participating as a flood victim potentially more regularly than ever before, the risk of loss of that ratable rises. I'd expect that to have a material adverse affect on the Town's finances and I'd be concerned about any resolution that doesn't consider the importance of keeping Willowbrook Mall dry.
Kristen Begtrup DeVries
2:24 pm on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Willowbrook taxes are $7,314,840.00 - 38 acres