Deadline to Apply for Vacant Board Seat is Friday
Former trustee Robyn Kingston resigned from her term on the Board of Education Jan. 9.
Friday is the deadline to submit resumes for consideration to fill a vacant seat on the Board of Education.
The seat is available because former trustee Robyn KIngston resigned form the Board Jan. 9. She moved to Texas.
Applicants must meet the following requirements:
- Be able to read and write.
- Be registered to vote in Wayne and not be disqualified as a voter under state law.
- Reside in Wayne for at least one year.
- Have no interest in any contract with, or claim against, the Board.
Current elected officials are exempt from applying.
The term of service will be until the next Board election in November. The person may choose to run for a one-year term in this year’s election and a full three-year term in 2014.
Interested applicants can send a letter of interest, along with a brief resume, to Juanita Petty, RSBA, Business Administrator/Board Secretary, Wayne Board of Education, 50 Nellis Drive, Wayne, NJ 07470.
— Have a question or news tip? Contact editor Daniel Hubbard at Daniel.Hubbard@patch.com or find us on Facebook and Twitter. For news straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.
Justice
2:32 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
No point applying. The trustee was selected prior to election which was orchestrated by outgoing Kingston. Her prolonged resignation made certain that the will of the people would be urinated on. Way to go Gonzalez and the BOE. Did you think of moving to a dictatorship? You are all well qualified and versed. Do not think of removing this post. First Amendment applies
Shameonyou
2:54 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Justice, you sound like someone who lost an election - major sour grapes. Your conspiracy theory sounds like it takes up a lot of your time. Sad.
stewart resmer
12:08 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
uhm shame? speaking of conspiracy theories? what do you think about the comments for @frankgallagher, a commenter with a recent account, has opinions about the school board matter and is NOT a registered voter in Wayne, and according to a zabbasearch.com is not listed as being from Wayne?
I will ask the question, is there any connection between this name and the districts newly hired PR firm?
Frank Gallagher
4:00 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
No connection whatsoever...like most on Patch, I volunteer my opinions.
But maybe I should consider going pro, you are pretty astute,
and you are apparently convinced that I am a pro.
I'll take that as a compliment...thank you very much.
Frank Gallagher
8:20 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Is this the protocol around here?
Somebody posts an opinion, and then stewart resmer investigates?...
reviews past activity, searches for possible addresses, reveals voting eligibility?
Hey J. Edgar Junior...not cool...give it a rest.
stewart resmer
11:02 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
gallagher, if you are going to inject yourself in to the discussion(s), and others are interested in what you have to add, then so it goes that some may be interested in who you are.
And right now you have not been identified by name as a registered voter.
A public register, accessable to the People. We call that an open society.
And, being as how the board hired a PR firm and judging by your comments you seem to bolster the notions you do it is reasonable then to question whether you are a schill?
Especially since you kinda just popped up after the issue became public?
Maybe you would like to take this opportunity to introduce yourself, or not?
Frank Gallagher
7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
resmer...I'm not a paid shill for the board, that's all there is to it,
but you believe whatever you want, I can't help you get rid of your boogiemen.
However, it is highly inappropriate, creepy actually, for you to go around
"investigating" others who post here, and are careless enough to use their real name.
In my book...that's stalking.
I plan to convince Dan Hubbard of the same when I see him this Friday.
Let's keep in touch, and see how this plays out...OK?
stewart resmer
4:25 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Perhaps a change in the township charter would avoid the appearance of cronyism, there does seem to be a pattern here in Wayne where mid term appointments are made to council, it seems odd that Mz Kingston did not tip her hand prior to the election thus denying the People the opportunity to decide the ladies replacement.
It makes one wonder who might be leaving elected office next, especially council?
Robert Pignatello
6:42 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
I certainly hope you are both wrong about that. Some new perspectives and an independent voice should be considered, welcomed and would certainly be healthy of course.
Justice
5:56 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
@ Stewart, Mz Kingston was no lady, as evidenced by her knowledge of the move to Texas back in September and her deliberate deception to the citizens of Wayne, ala, the children will decide? Really, seriously, please. What kind of fools do you think the citizens of Wayne are?. I am sure those Texans will welcome Ms Kingston with open arms into their fold. Right, a Yank no less. We would like to know how well her tactics hold up in the Lone Star State.
stewart resmer
7:55 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
dont sugar coat it on my account justice, tell me how you really feel? lol
Chicken Little
5:43 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
it is clear that none of you know Robyn. You are so off the mark. Justice, you are just a plain fool. She was a great PTO mom before coming to the board. She was a great board member. As for the move to Texas, she had hoped to keep her kids in school here until June, and did not know that she would be leaving mid school year.
You are all a bunch of paranoid conspiracy theorists.
It's the board of ed, for crying out loud, not congress. Get a grip.
Justice
6:45 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Chicken Little, the ONLY reason that I am responding to you at all is that a lack of response might be interpreted as acceptance. Prior to calling me or anyone else a fool, check yourself in the mirror as it appears that you might have swallowed the kool-aid. As respects to paranoid, are you a psychiatrist who is authorized to call anyone "paranoid"? If not, I suggest you keep your day job. Your implication regarding Congress is insulting, considering the recent board of ed tactics.
Justice
7:03 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Just to refresh memories, here is an OCTOBER 19 article regarding Robyn's "rumored" move to Texas. OCTOBER 19, less than 3 weeks before the election. Keep drinking your Kool-Aid folks:
http://wayne.patch.com/articles/education-trustee-addresses-rumors-she-s-resigning
Board of Education trustee Robyn Kingston addressed rumors Thursday night that she would resign her board seat this year.
Resident Mark Klypka said at Thursday's Board of Education meeting rumors have been circulating that Kingston would resign her seat this year and move to Texas.
“Hopefully, it is not true and if it is true I find it very unprofessional,” Klypka said.
Klypka regularly attends meetings and asks officials questions regarding the district, its personnel, and how it operates.
Kingston seemed to take offense to the statement.
“If you heard a rumor it would have been nice if you came to me instead of grandstanding at the podium,” said Kingston, who was elected to the board in 2011. Her term expires in 2014. “When I decide to share that information and when we decide to move then I may share it with you. I ask you to respect my privacy.”
Klypka said he respects Kingston’s privacy.
“If you’re making decisions that affect the children and the taxpayers that’s what I’m concerned about,” Klypka said.
Justice
7:04 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Trustee Bob Ceberio objected to Klypka’s statement and the two briefly exchanged words. Former trustee Joanie Walsh shouted from the audience. Board President Donald Pavlak Jr. then adjourned the meeting for a few minutes.
After the meeting was reconvened, Board Attorney Isabel Machalo stressed the need for members of the public to “respect the privacy of individuals not only of the public but our employees, including the board members.”
Justice
7:31 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Property taxes have increased to unbearable levels. The Board of Ed has spent like drunken sailors (no disrespect to sailors, just a figure of speech) and yet the "report card" ratings for the Wayne School System have not increased accordingly. Do we really want another "appointee" orchestrated by Kingston? Keep drinking the Kool-aid....
Justice
7:42 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Wasn't current Board Attorney Isabel Machalo an appointee by Gonzalez, hired by the Board which comprised the most recent spending spree? Didn't Gonzalez bring her, his co-super and the public relations firm with him? Yes, a dictatorship...
stewart resmer
7:53 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
I am sorry to have to say this has been handled very poorly, When one is elected to public office they are accounatble to the People, here thanks to Patch and Justice we recall the chronology and chain of remarks that ultimately led to where we are at today, yet another individual elected to public office has made a decision to leave and the replacement does not carry the consent of the People but rather the prerogative of the board.
Intentional or not, this state of affairs erodes the perception that here, The People rule.
Jack Q
2:54 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
So I guess you are equally as offended by Katherine Gillibrand replacing Hillary Clinton, Bob Menendez replacing Jon Corzine, Jesse Jackson Jr resigning right after election, Paul Kirk replacing Ted Kennedy... Same thinig, different levels of government. Should she have announced her intentions sooner, probably. The one who should be really ticked is Cathy Kazan who got the next amount of votes.
stewart resmer
3:57 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Cathy Kazan did garner an impressive number of votes, so it would make sense that the board would acknowledge that fact by giving her the opportunity to serve.
Justice
8:20 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
"Applicants must meet the following requirements:
Be able to read and write.
Be registered to vote in Wayne and not be disqualified as a voter under state law.
Reside in Wayne for at least one year.
Have no interest in any contract with, or claim against, the Board."
Does not specify which language, let alone English?
Just more of the same....
This is the nonsense that has caused our property taxes to orbit.
Chicken Little
11:45 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
I rest my case.
Justice
1:16 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
So you admit that there is misconduct and liability on the part of the trustees of the Board of Education? Just add another suit.
Chicken Little
2:54 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
I admit that you are a fruit loop.
Hinderson
2:54 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
What a rant by Justice. Sounds personal as no laws (the laws that the rest of us follow) were broken and no ethics were violate. District finally has a Superintendent (after too many years) and it looks like all good is finally happening. Taxes? If I recall, the board of education came in UNDER the amount they were allowed to raise taxes to and cut a few million. If people like Justice get on the board of education, I am sure our Superintendent will fly out the door. Maybe that is the issue - people like Justice can't get on the board of education and are VERY bitter. Glad things are moving in the direction they are. Justice, you keep talking to yourself.
Frank Gallagher
3:29 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
"Applicants must meet the following requirements:
Have no interest in any contract with, or claim against, the Board."
Does this requirement apply to candidates running for election to the Board,
or just those applying to be appointed by the Board itself ?
Don't those whose spouses work in the Wayne school system
have an interest contracts with the Board ?
Justice
4:52 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Regarding, the decision being left to children, here is another article:
http://www.northjersey.com/news/186508541_Wayne_board_of_ed_member_resigns.html
"Wayne board of ed member resigns
THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 2013 LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY JANUARY 17, 2013, 1:58 AM
BY DEBRA WINTERS
STAFF WRITER
WAYNE TODAY
PRINT | E-MAIL
WAYNE - School trustee Robin Kingston has resigned from the board of education effective Jan. 9.
The news was announced at last Thursday night's board meeting, at which time district business administrator Juanita Petty said the board would be looking to appoint someone to fill the open seat by the Feb. 21 meeting.
During a phone interview with the Wayne Today, Kingston, who is now residing in Texas, said that she relocated after her husband accepted a job position out of state about six months ago. Leaving the decision up to their children, they decided to make the full transition by the 2013 school semester."
Justice
4:55 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
@Chicken Little, it seems that you MUST have the last word, no matter how inconsequential or ridiculous. I feel sorry for you.
Justice
5:01 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
@Hinderson: "What a rant by Justice. Sounds personal as no laws (the laws that the rest of us follow) were broken and no ethics were violate. District finally has a Superintendent (after too many years) and it looks like all good is finally happening. Taxes? If I recall, the board of education came in UNDER the amount they were allowed to raise taxes to and cut a few million. If people like Justice get on the board of education, I am sure our Superintendent will fly out the door. Maybe that is the issue - people like Justice can't get on the board of education and are VERY bitter. Glad things are moving in the direction they are. Justice, you keep talking to yourself." Rant??? I Think Not... Personal ??? Never,.. Why would I want to be on the Wayne Board of Education? Bitter??? Not at All...Coming in under the amount?? Creative Math... Laws broken, ethics violated?? To Be Determined Through a Process Called Discovery in a Lawsuit...Superintendent.. Why was a lightweight from an urban district brought to Wayne?...Why were his cronies immediately hired??? Good Super??? Maybe/ Maybe Not. It Remains to be seen... Talking to myself??...You were reading and expressing your opinion..The First Amendment Right...
Justice
5:09 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
@Shameonyou,,
"Justice, you sound like someone who lost an election - major sour grapes. Your conspiracy theory sounds like it takes up a lot of your time. Sad. "
Once Again, let Discovery show the facts.
Lost an election? When I run, I win..
Sad that you feel the necessity to state sour grapes..There is no reason for me to have sour grapes.
Justice
5:11 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Meow..the claws are out...As much as I love cats, it is time for the felines to lick their wounds..Meow
Packanack1996
8:22 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Yikes, Fruit Loops is right. Someone needs an anger management class. Wacky Wayne, we have them all.
Justice
8:29 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Packanack 1996..litigation 101: when all else fails, name call. Bravo.
Frank Gallagher
8:41 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Justice...my observation is also that yes you are freaking out.
I agree with your basic assessment...that Kingston played the system,
but hey it's all in the game...you either play or get played.
Nobody can follow your rants....fruit loops it is.
Justice
8:54 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Frank, I could care less about your observation. Obviously the corruption does not bother you. It is all in the game, to use your words. Corruption is not healthy for the community, especially a part of the community that influences young minds.
Frank Gallagher
11:04 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
You care, otherwise you would not have replied.
The Kingston maneuver was played, but not corrupt.
stewart resmer
7:59 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Franks lets agree to disagree that gaming the potical system is not a corruptable state of affairs. This towns political process where appointments are made time and again for vacant seats is the routine, and if you are not pulsed by the statistics of the political machine and the perception of the machinations of cronyism, patronage, and the appearance of political machine at work, then perhaps you are part of the problem?
At this juncture it has happened again just weeks after an election. I do feel that because the individual named here knew there were family stressors at play that would have surely and heavily influenced her tenure that perhaps she should have made a more prudent decision in the intereests of fair play and the People and students to have just simply announced her intentions to leave and step aside. IMHO
Frank Gallagher
11:00 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Fair play interests are considered within the law.
If accepting actions in compliance with law makes me part of a problem,
then you are going to have to explain to me what the problem is.
As Jack Q pointed out above, Katherine Gillibrand appointed to replace Hillary Clinton, Bob Menendez appointed to replace Jon Corzine, Paul Kirk appointed to replace Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson Jr resigned right after election.
I ddin't have a problem with those actions, I don't have a problem with Kingston's either.
The rules of office, and succession to office, are the very structure of our government.
Perhaps we should agree that you want to change the structure of our government,
and that I'll have to accept any changes you manage to accomplish without charging corruption.
Frank Gallagher
11:00 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Kingston's decision when to resign is exactly the kind of decision that she was elected to make. She's trying to protect the interests of her constituents through the remainder of her term, just as she promised she would.
stewart resmer
1:13 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Frank upon review of your profile, you seem to heavily favor school related issues, and only as of late, around the time the district hire a PR firm.
Are you Frank B, E, or J?
Chicken Little
9:09 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Resmer and Justice,
Stop with the political games theories. This woman did not know that she was going to pull her kids out of school midyear. No parent wants to do that. She did not take a new job in Texas. Her husband did, and they had been living apart in limbo, waiting to see how the new job would pan out.
The paranoia and innuendo is ridiculous. You smear someone who has done so much for the schools, first on the PTO and then on the Board. You do this because your own life is stank.
stewart resmer
1:31 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
CL-oh please, save the fairy rales for the wee ones will ya, they'll believe anything you dream up. Honestly, you think a sophisticated member of the community who is elected to an august board responsible for the interests of thousands of students and millions of dollars of taxpayer monies, hundredes of district jobs, did not have the circumspection to plan out a personal life choice in advance of the election? Some one who just decided from one moment to the next on impulse?
I am sure this was a difficult choice, maybe even agonizing?
Bottom line? Yet another appointment by a board instead of a timely choice by the People.
Bill
9:09 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
The morals and ethics that have come through comments on this "patch" are truly astounding. Even wolves have higher standards
Justice
12:26 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Keep drinking the kool aid sweetie
Justice
8:05 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Sophisticated member of the community? I thought I was watching a "Bravo" trash series on cable. If it hadn't affected my budget with the "creative math" that came about by changing the Board of Education Elections from Spring to November, thereby introducing the 2% cap WITHOUT VOTER INPUT, I would actually be laughing. However, there is nothing funny about property taxes skyrocketing for no reason other than for someone's ego who is used to a lavish lifestyle that she herself NEVER earned.
Bill
9:39 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
CL, There was a letter authored and circulated by Kingston and her cohort smearing the candidate who actually would have been on the Board by the Will of the People. Obviously, you are not as "in" as you think you are. This candidate still won, in spite of the mud slinging. An audit is in order questioning all of Kingston's decisions while she was a trustee, a cause of action resultant from her election tactics. The only thing the Board can do is to give the position to the candidate who was wanted by the people had Kingston appropriately stepped down instead of vehemently denying rumors 2 weeks before the election, only to resign with NO NOTICE shortly after. Her cohorts NEED to abstain from the vote, if not resign from the Board.
stewart resmer
11:08 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
good point Bill, the hit piece(s) contained the usual ad hominem based in character assassination rather than the framing of the actual issues of our time, distributed at the very last opportunity in order to prohibit a response to.
It seems so low road when you really think about it, I think it illustates the sort of mentality the substitutes for reasonable respectful discourse here.
Frank Gallagher
10:41 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Bill...the sequence of your previous post is somewhat confusing.
"There was a letter smearing the candidate who actually would have been on the Board. This candidate still won."
So there was a candidate smeared, who would have been on the Board? What does that mean "would have been on the Board" ?
And the candidate still won? ...so the candidate that was smeared won the election anyway, and is now on the Board? Is that correct?
"Give the position to the candidate who was wanted by the people."
So this is a different candidate...not the one who was smeared?
How did you determine this candidate was "wanted by the people" ?
In any case, don't expect any "cohorts" to abstain or resign. After all, they were elected to appoint should any member resign mid-term. They all took an oath to that effect...it's their sworn duty to appoint Kingston's replacement.
Al Scala
10:41 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013
The sad part is that Trustee Kingston, along with another Trustee, sent a politically motivated letter, smearing Candidate Kazan, who in my opinion is a very good candidate and would have made a good Trustee. Trustee Kingston knowing she's moving out of Town at some point soon,moves to Texas. Smear somebody, then move. O.K. It's politics. The sadder part of this story is the voting public bought it and didn't vote for Kazan.
Al Scala
10:41 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Hey Dan.....Would you give me the courtesy of telling me why you deleted my post? There was nothing in there that was untrue.
stewart resmer
8:13 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Frank, do the math, unless you're a republican that Bill Clinton was refering to when he remarked their math did not add up. lol
Mrs Kasan got 6200 votes despite the contemptable smear job. You seem to take no exception to such conduct then, is that what we are to take away?
Is this the way of it when it comes to elections even to a school board here abouts?
Well let me assure you that those of us from either side of the political didivde simply do not abide and the good folk will always turn away from it.
Al sometimes the que for comments can be delayed for what ever reason.
Frank Gallagher
4:33 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Some didn't get a letter, and still didn't vote for Kazan.
Kingston didn't want Kazan on the Board?...well she's not the only one.
Don't expect Kazan to be appointed, she ran and lost.
Not sure that she would have won if 4 seats were open anyway.
Maybe we'll see about that next time.
Bill
10:08 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Frank, Since you are so BIG on oaths and jobs that the trustees are sworn to, I would like to see the written version of these oaths. Also, where is it written that a mid-term appointment is required in lieu of leaving a position vacant or an election for such a position?
Frank Gallagher
8:35 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013
What is preventing you from viewing the written version of the oaths?
The oaths are read aloud at the induction, so they are written down.
It's obvious that a mid-term replacement is permiited by law,
and likely that it is mandated.
I'm sure the BA can show you where that is written as well.
Bill
10:08 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Frank,
Do you actually have the stats of how people voted dependent on the smear letter?
Well, here are the stats of the vote and clearly, Kazan would have won had the fourth seat been open:
http://passaiccountynj.org/archives/53/2012%20General%20Election%20-%20Official%20Results.pdf
Wayne Board of Education
41/41 100.00%
Under Votes 37847
Over Votes 0
Vote Count Percent
NP - Michael L. BUBBA 7,573 20.90%
NP - Catherine KAZAN 6,793 18.75%
NP - Kim ESSEN 7,707 21.27%
NP - Donald G. MONTEYNE 6,101 16.84%
NP - Eileen ALBANESE 8,053 22.23%
Total 36,227 100.00%
Frank Gallagher
8:35 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Bill...the results you posted were for an election where 3 seats were open.
If 4 seats were open, perhaps other candidates would have run, perhaps more letters would have been written, perhaps voters would have voted differently.
There's no way of knowing what the results would have been in a some election
that did not take place, so it's not clear at all where Kazan would have finished.
What we do know is this...she ran and lost....finished fourth in a race for 3 seats.
We know that there are enough voters who do not want her on the Board
to keep here from being elected, and I suspect enough current members
who do not want her on the Board to keep her from being appointed.
Justice
8:15 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Frank,
Can't sleep at night?
Frank Gallagher
8:35 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Thanks for you interest in my sleep schedule.
I rise early on Sundays, so that I can take my elderly mother to early mass,
she lives some distance away.
Justice
8:43 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Al, Bill and Stewart, The letter that you all describe would cause most people to question the integrity and honesty of the authors. Well, Kingston is in South Lake; but the other author (s) are obviously still on the Board. Moral Turpitude has been committed and whoever else contributed to this travesty needs to be investigated.
Justice
8:45 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
For Frank, who appears to be "all in the game" and does not subscribe to morals, here is a definition of "Moral Turpitude":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_turpitude
Moral turpitude is a legal concept in the United States that refers to "conduct that is considered contrary to community standards of justice, honesty or good morals."[1] It appears in U.S. immigration law from the nineteenth century.[2] In other common law jurisdictions it is dated or obsolete.[3]
The concept of moral turpitude escapes precise definition but has been described as an "act of baseness, vileness or depravity in the private and social duties which a man owes to his fellowmen, or to society in general, contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between man and man."[4]
The classification of a crime or other conduct as constituting moral turpitude has significance in several areas of law. First, prior conviction of a crime of moral turpitude (or in some jurisdictions, moral turpitude conduct, even without a conviction) is considered to have a bearing on the honesty of a witness and may be used for purposes of witness impeachment.[5] Second, moral turpitude offenses may be grounds to deny or revoke a professional license such as a teaching credential,[6] license to practice law,[7] or other licensed profession...."
Justice
8:46 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
".... Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude
Fraud:
Making false representation
Knowledge of such false representation by the perpetrator
Reliance on the false representation by the person defrauded
An intent to defraud
The actual act of committing fraud "
Frank Gallagher
8:35 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013
I have no first-hand knowledge of a smearing letter.
Are you suggesting that a crime was committed?
It's likely that your interpretation is just your opinion, and that differing opinions exist.
Al Scala
10:08 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
As far as the vetting process for a replacement, it is a farce. It's window dressing . I would imagine, by law there is a process they must go through. The replacement has already been chosen by the "inner circle" .I also predict that the person will be a PTO mom.
Justice
10:27 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Which goes back to my original statement of "Justice
2:32 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
No point applying..."
As far as PTO mom's go, unless they have worked and actually earned a living, budgeted, multi-tasked, this Board will continue to spend foolishly without restraint as it has done orbiting our Property Taxes. Not all, but some of these "moms" think that their husbands' name is Credit Card and the Citizens of Wayne are the Bank of Fools.
Jack Q
10:10 am on Monday, January 28, 2013
So, a Mom that has worked and "earned a living" is worthy of your nomination? Wow, I didn't realize that it was 1950 again. Why would a PTO Mom who "doesn't earn a living" be bad in your eyes? After all, you complain about everyone else, you know the husbands of teachers, ex-teachers, husbands of school employees.... What is your ideal candidate Justice?
Justice
7:34 am on Monday, January 28, 2013
Frank, Is that what organized religion teaching these days: Bear False Witness Against Your Neighbors? Do you even live in Wayne? You never answered Stewart's question.
Frank Gallagher
11:12 am on Monday, January 28, 2013
Are we expected to answer nonsensical, and/or rhetorical questions?
Yes I live in Wayne, no I'm not B, E or J (athough I don't really know what that means),
and your question about organized religion teaching obviously doesn't deserve an answer.
Justice
10:16 am on Monday, January 28, 2013
Someone Voted By The People. A non working PTO mom is the 50's.
Jack Q
11:12 am on Monday, January 28, 2013
In your post from Sunday, non-working mothers need not apply. Or are you retracting your asinine statement?
Frank Gallagher
11:12 am on Monday, January 28, 2013
Then Monteyne would qualify under your criteria.
I could support Monteyne, and hope they appoint him again,
although I don't expect that to happen.
Justice
12:08 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Wayne has not been a small community in years. It is quite large with a budget that affects mine. Whereas I can shop for the best deal in Consumer goods, the budget is shoved down my throat. I have every right to know the competence of everyone who is making those decisions for me. If disclosure is a problem they should not be in the public eye. Someone with dubious morals and bears false witness should not be on a Board.
Al Scala
4:00 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Mentioning Monteyne, the irony of his defeat is this.....He came in last place, getting the least amount of votes, yet was the most highly educated. He's a West Point graduate, and I believe he has 2 or 3 Masters degrees. Not really sure how effective he was on the board. It seems the people who brought him in and appointed him, turned against him in this election, as they were only supporting Esson and Albanese.
Al Scala
4:00 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Justice....one of the problems here in Town is you can only vote for 4 of the 9 Council members, 3 At-Large, and the one representing your District or Ward. The other 5, vote on matters that affect your taxes and quality of life, however, you can't vote for or against them. Frankly, I don't like the form of government we have here. I would rather see all the Council seats be elected by the majority of all voters here in town and not by a majority of a given District or Ward. Not sure what type of gov't we have here under the Faulkner Act, but certainly would love to see it change, so we could vote for or against all the people sitting on the council.
Frank Gallagher
8:20 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Just look at where the at-large officeholders have been from in the past,
most often the mayor and always 2 of 3 at-large council from Packanack.
If all council seat were at-large...none by Ward,
then you could expect the mayor and 6 of 9 on the council to be from Packanack.
Is that really what you want?
Even the Democrats' HQ is in Packanack. C'mon man.
Frank Gallagher
8:20 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Among the complaints about mid-term appointments is that
it gives the advantage of incumbency to someone who was not elected.
The last election proves how bogus that complaint can be.
Al Scala
8:59 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Frank....what I want is to be able to vote for or against anyone who is voting on Town budgets and whatever else they vote on that affects my life or my taxes. If the people of Wayne want to elect 6 of 9 people from Packanack, or any other part of town, then so be it! C'mon man!
Al Scala
9:13 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Frank....if the Board of Ed regulars would have supported Monteyne in the last election, he may have one. Esson and Albanese were strongly supported by the regular faction who were eagerly supported by the PTO's, and the WRRO. He was not and thus lost. Your point is moot as far as I'm concerned.
Frank Gallagher
11:08 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Monteyne lost, and so did Kazan.
Agreed, the argument that those appointed as mid-term replacements
have an advantage in the subsequent election has little merit.
Frank Gallagher
11:08 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Al...you can't always get what you want, so you are not likely get everything that you want.
The combination of Ward & at-large representatives is modeled after our federal system,
do you expect to be able to vote for all state and federal legislators as well?
The Ward system assures that all sections of town get representation in local government,
I hadn't imagined anyone opposing that....but here you are defying the imagination.
Al Scala
7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Frank...your point is well taken on the Ward/District system we have here in Wayne. I don't like it and frankly, don't think it will ever change. Art Smith for years argued this point and actually had a petition signed by quite a few people here in Town. With his passing, no one really knows whatever happened to the petition. As far as your snide remark about me defying the imagination, I would guess it is your imagination on the matter that is suspect.
Jack Q
7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Al, Do you think there might have been a reason Mr Monteyne was not supported? Maybe it was his voting record. I don't know. I don't agree that with the mid-term appointments that seem to define this town either.
Al Scala
9:17 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
JackQ.....Monteyne is a very nice man. Quite intelligent and very well educated. I honestly don't know why he was jettisoned off the ticket. It surprised the heck out of me.
Bill
8:20 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
What have Essen and .... bought to the table?
Justice
8:33 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Stewart is not the only one investigating and sharing. He just posts faster. J Edgar needs a trip to Wayne. Heaven knows what will be dredged up from the pit.
Justice
3:45 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Frank, What SS? I constantly zabasearch, white pages search etc. just like everyone else. So what? We live in a technological world where there is no privacy. In the past, phone books were used to look up people; now it is the internet. Phone books are obsolete the minute they are printed, especially Verizon as they do not include listings from Cable and other sources. The issue that Stewart and others may have with you is that you are posing as a Wayne resident when there is no record of a Frank Gallagher in Wayne. If you are using a screen name, then be honest and admit it. Many people are obvious with their screen names, some are not. The other concern, at least on my part, is the money spent on a PR firm and the extent that the PR firm has gone to in the past to sway how citizens voted in elections. In another instance, a college professor allegedly had her students post various comments as respects to an upcoming election. The students were not Wayne residents but "posers" who eventually admitted to the game.
Frank Gallagher
7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
People use an obvious screen name, and resmer harrangues about using a real name.
Then somebody pops in using thier real name, and subjects themselves to stalking
OK...so to be clear...there is no expectation of privacy unless you use a screen name,
is that correct?
stewart resmer
7:54 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
what ever frank, what ever
Justice
3:47 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I can't help but think that the non answer to Bill's question about Essen is an answer in itself. Silence is such a tell.
Justice
3:50 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Frank, Your comparison of wards to states has me wondering if perhaps Wayne is planning to institute a separate "Ward Tax", just as the states have separate taxes. You may be onto something. Ward 1 pays the least, while Ward 6 the most????? Interesting
Frank Gallagher
7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
You don't have to wonder, go to the council meeting and ask Joe Scuralli,
he will straighten you out.
Al Scala
7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Frank, there are towns, here in New Jersey that all the Councilpeople are elected by all the people. There are no wards or districts. Hale don is one such town, as is North Haledon and Prospect Park. Yes, they are much smaller both in population and land size. So again, your point is moot. Frank, you're a shill. I don't believe for one minute that is your correct name. By the way, your name is not on the voting rolls.
Chicken Little
7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Justice
Are you a shut in? Are you stuck in your room all day with nothing to do? You need a job, a hobby, volunteer work...something. 86 posts, and about half are from you.
Justice
8:32 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
CL. I guess you have never heard of tablets or smart phones or other devices that have the capability of transmitting messages on social media such as this. I am glad that you are counting the number of posts I make. Have you counted the number of false statements made against innocent parties lately?
Justice
8:35 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Frank, Do you mean the way Scuralli straightened out his family business in Totowa?
stewart resmer
8:57 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
whoa JUSTICE? what is that all about?
Justice
9:46 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Stewart, it is Frank that THREATENED me with Scuralli.
Frank Gallagher
11:15 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I threatened you? How is that?
I just re-read the entire thread, where are the false statements? What are you talking about?
stewart resmer
8:58 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
frank is scuralli lol