patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Smoking Ban Considered for Recreational Areas

New law would prohibit smoking at all swimming areas, parks and recreational facilities, including their parking lots.

 

Going to a park or swimming pool may be a little healthier of an experience soon.

The council introduced an ordinance Wednesday that would prohibit smoking at municipal parks and recreational areas.

Residents would be banned from smoking or even carrying a lighted cigarette, cigar, or pipe in all parks, recreational areas, and swimming facilities, including their parking lots and driveways. Electronic cigarettes would also be banned.

Smoking is already prohibited “in all areas of” Barbour Pond Park. No smoking signs are conspicuously posted at the facility.

Currently, smoking is only allowed in the parking lots of North Cove Park, Captain Michael Kilroy Memorial Park, and the James W. Roe Memorial Pool.

Personnel from two non-profits have expressed their support for the legislation.

“We definitely believe creating smoke-free environments is important, especially for children and teenagers,” said Karen Blumenfeld, executive director of tobacco control policy for Global Advisor of Smoke-Free Policy.  “There are shared spaces and they should be accessible to everyone. People shouldn’t have to deal with other people’s smoking when they go out.”

The council is scheduled to vote on the ordinance Sept. 19. If it is approved Wayne would join 12 other Passaic County municipalities that completely ban smoking at their recreational facilities. Pompton Lakes, Wayne, Totowa, and North Haledon are the four currently don’t.

Paterson’s new smokefree laws went into affect on May 20.

Cindy Meakem, coordinator of Tobacco Free For A Healthy New Jersey, said that the law will serve as an example to kids about good behavior.

"Kids mimic what they see," Meakem said. "Little by little we're trying to steer children away from smoking as something that is socially acceptable. This measure definitely works to accomplish that. The less they see adults smoking, the more likely they are not to think that it is okay to smoke."

Meakem said that the measure would save the town money and work to beautify the town in the long run.

“You won’t have to pay people to spend time picking up cigarette butts and it just makes everything look more beautiful too,” Meakem said. “It also helps prevent fires.”

— Have a question or news tip? Contact editor Daniel Hubbard at Daniel.Hubbard@patch.com or find us on Facebook and Twitter. For news straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.

  • Do you think the proposed smoking ban is good idea?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        8 (44%)
    • No
        10 (55%)
    Total votes: 18
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Public Health and Wayne Town Council

Bob

11:11 am on Friday, August 17, 2012

E-cigs compete with Chantix and Nicoderm, thereby defeating the entire purpose of smoking bans, the bottom line of Pfizer.

Reply

still in town 78

5:47 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

I believe The firehouses are not owned by the town! S

Reply

Joe videodummy

7:48 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012

They also should include the facility of any organization that solicit's or petitions for donations in town whether publicly or privately. That would include firehouses, churches, etc. Remember, we're doing this for the children so the ordinance should be bold not vague. It needs to be defined clearly.

Reply

Justice

7:27 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

More government intrusion into private lives. Where does it stop? I am not a smoker; but I do condone interfering with people's lives. It is plain wrong. Today the cigs, tomorrow the soda (oops, isn't that what Bloomberg is pulling in New York)..

Reply

Justice

7:29 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Joe, I agree with what you are saying about the children. They should be protected until they reach the age of reason and can decide for themselves. My argument is with government intrusion into personal lives. God gave us free will, let not governments take it away.

Reply

Queen of Wayne

8:48 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012

Reject
Queen of Wayne
8:43 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
I am very annoyed with certain individuals running this town - ill be sure to not vote for them next election. The cancer diagnosis number in this state is extremely high and it is not because of second hand smoking, the pollution in the air, factories that burn oil and blow it back into the air, very high industrial state, lets start workIng on them going green rather than on a paying member of the pool or wayne tax payers to stop smoking everywhere - there's enough room to roam in our parks away from the playground and in lite hiding from the kids so there's no reason to ban it - they do designate smoking areas but they shouldnt do it in the front where all can see....there's cigarette butt holders in many places and most do dispose them in there, kids throwing garbage while playing and adults while eating is a lot more than a cigarette butt here and there in a parking lot- so lets not do this people - this is no longer land of the FREE! And YOU are allowing this happen slowly, I am worried for what's left for the future - they are controlling or entire lives - plz help stopping it now!

Reply

Joygarden

7:34 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012

So you're telling me that on a quiet day, with no one around, someone would not even be able to sit under a tree and light up a cigarette if they so desire? What is this country coming to? I don't smoke either, but I just can't see a bunch of health nazis infringing on basic rights. From what I've seen, most smokers in our town are polite about it and don't smoke around children and their activities. People smoke around their own children, and you can't help that. Queen of Wayne is right! The pollution is what's killing us. On certain evenings, especially rainy ones, you can clearly smell the pungent emissions from some unknown source spewing smelly, who knows what kind of chemicals into the air. I have noticed this numerous times in the Alps Road vicinity, and it's made me wonder why they do this at night. Trying to hide something perhaps? Has anyone else experienced this?
Doesn't our town council have anything better to do than to come up with silly ordinances like this one? If they really want us to be healthy, perhaps they could mandate a "walking every evening" ordinance. Ha ha. It would do us a lot more good! We are slowly but surely losing our freedoms. Much too often we're being ostracized by society/government if we don't follow the model of what is perceived to be "right" even as a law-abiding citizen. We're told what and what not to eat, think, say, do, etc. Now they want to control the open air. Sad. I guess the chains of Puritanism still bind us. Sigh....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe videodummy

12:47 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

How about if that tree was in your backyard ? Would you consider this trespassing, or discard it as an individual enjoying the 'quiet moment'.
It's okay to promote homosexuality to minors by reminding them that it's accptable to hold hands when they are asked to line up two by two, or enforcing anti bully policies when they are mocked for obeying the command, but it's unacceptable to for two same sex adults to hold hands, but only if one of them happens to holding a lite cigarette in the other.
With all the laws, rules and legislation against adults, hopefully kids wont become board with trying to mimic adults and begin mimicking their pets, which are still allowed to urinate in public, or sniff whatever looks interesting.

Joygarden

1:04 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Get those eyeballs past your NOSE and READ. I said that I DON'T SMOKE and I DON'T. Some people throw all kinds of crap out of their cars, not just cigarette butts. So by your logic, we should ban all items that make trash. No one should be throwing any type of garbage on the ground. Also, you totally missed my point. When they are not bothering anyone with smoke, people should have the right to have a cigarette in a park, Mr. Think You're Perfect.

Reply

Patricia Rivera

9:38 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Totally against this ban. Smoking is legal and smokers need to fight this assault on their rights. The jury is still out on second hand smoke. Another assault on our freedoms. I am not a smoker and do not like being around people who smoke. But they have a right to. Both my parents were smokers, heavy smokers and I, nor any of my siblings were affected and none of us smoke.

Reply

Joe videodummy

4:44 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Every adult is a mentor to young chilren. Whether they know it or not, or whether they like it or not. Children mimic actions, demeanor, emotions, and character- the same as adults mimic other adults ( and children as well ).
A responsible parent isn't going to smoke at youth functions because they know it's morally wrong. They don't need more laws to address those that don't.
But if the council is so adamant that they feel it's their anal responsibility to clarify the existing law, then they should be compelled to bannish smoking at all public places of interest, leaving nothing to be questioned. This, rather than picking away at the public slowly should ban all smoking in,on, or around any parks, ballfields, municipal buildings, schools, public vehicles, churches, libraries, courthouses, museums, beaches, pools, lakes, including any events or functions that are open to the general public that may be occupied by, or seen by children.
Instead of questioning how far our council will go, we should applaud them for going all the way.
My preferred brand can't be bought or smoked in any of these places anyway, so what does it matter ?

Reply

Steve

8:28 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

How politically correctly stupid.

Reply

Joygarden

9:28 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Joe your reading comprehension is sorely lacking. You really need to pay attention to what is said before you reply.

Reply

Jacqueline Pisatowski

10:48 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Get the government off of our backs - this is a free country - are we going to turn into California??? What's nexrt?

Reply

Mattie Burns

10:47 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

Government controlling our lives. How dare they.

Reply

Wayne's World

11:13 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

As a shareholder of Phillip Morris, I strongly object to any anti-smoking ordinance. Keep smoking, teenage morons and addicted old-timers. Third-world countries, keep up the good work by increasing smoking in your societies at 10% per year! PM might as well own a printing press. It's like owning a piece of Ft. Knox. My only regret is that our health insurance will continue to go up steeply as people continue to kill themselves with food and cigarettes.

Reply

Brad

11:21 am on Friday, August 24, 2012

can we start enforcing the law against litter. I am sick of driving on route 23 and having people throw their lit cigarette out of the window, not only is smoking a disgusting habit, they are littering and the lit cigarette could ignite oil on the roads. This is also a distraction when driving. They want to force pet owners to have their dogs in a harness in the car because that is distracting to drivers, how about banning smoking in cars. That is just as distracting and it leads to people littering all over the place. Let's clean up our town

Reply

Leave a comment