Board Selects Ortiz to Fill Vacant Seat
Oritz will serve out the rest of Robyn Kingston's term. Ortiz said he plans on participating in special budget meeting Wednesday night.
The Board of Education selected Rogger Ortiz to fill a vacant spot on the board a special meeting Monday night.
Ortiz will serve the rest of former trustee Robyn Kingston's term. Kingston resigned from the board in January and moved to Texas.
"On behalf of the applicants, I want to thank the board for interviewing us and I thank the board for selecting me," Ortiz said. "I look forward to working with them."
Ortiz and his wife own Christina by Design salon. His sons attend George Washington Middle School and Randall Carter Elementary School. He coaches soccer at the Boys and Girls Club of Wayne.
Ortiz was one of five people who interviewed for the position.
"Whoever they picked, Wayne would have been in good hands," Ortiz said. "I was very impressed with the other applicants."
Ortiz said he will participate as a trustee at a special public meeting on the school district's budget Wednesday night at Wayne Hills High School. He will need to be sworn in before the meeting is held.
— Have a question or news tip? Contact editor Daniel Hubbard at Daniel.Hubbard@patch.com or find us on Facebook and Twitter. For news straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.
gendisarray
11:13 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I was under the impression that it was the mayor who was supposed to appoint someone when there was a mid-term vacancy on the board, no?
Concerned Parent
11:13 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Congratulations to Rogger! Very nice guy, excellent father. Will do the board proud, i'm sure.
Scondo
11:13 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Thank you for stepping up Mr. Ortiz, good luck in your service to the town.
stewart resmer
10:51 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I am curious if the rock paper scissors method to determine Mr Ortiz's appointment was employed or is there something, anything, in his background that might uniquely qualify the man for the position rather than what we read here?
W.elk
11:13 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
When I read the comments in the last post about this and saw it had to be closed, I went and googled these people to see if I could figure out what the hubbub was about. The only one who had anything that qualified him for this kind of position (actually other people and their accomplishments were not even googlable, which is weird) was the guy who is a VP of a college in NYC who was a Mayor of Verona and I figured there was no way he wouldn't be picked. Which is logical since this is a position where you deal with people's taxes and the town's money. It's nice that this guy is a soccer coach, but frankly that is very different than deciding how to manage a budget, which takes other skills than working with kids.
This isn't about if you own a business in Wayne or about working with kids. It's about working with taxpayer money and while I understand that politics are politics, this appointment seems soooo...odd.
Al Scala
12:39 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
W.elk.....totally agree. No disrespect intended to Mr Ortiz at all. I don't know him. I think the guy you're talking about is Robert Pignatello. (I think that is his name). I believe he is an executive at John Jay College in NYC! He may hold a financial position there. I would think his qualifications were appropriate to be on the board, after all he does work in education.
stewart resmer
12:05 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
good points W.E
Frank Gallagher
12:39 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Thankfully they made the appointment before Justice impeached them.
Justice, did you initiate the impeachment proceedings yet?
William
6:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
One thing I have experienced in my position of hiring people is that the resume is NOT always indicative of the person. Resumes look wonderful. That why in the HR world we INTERVIEW.
Justice
11:21 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
He was appointed not elected. We the people must be kept in the dark. We may just be able to follow the money if we are told anything.
I don't think so
12:39 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I'm so tired of you and your posts Stewart. You are a complete hypocrite! You were saying how you thought the smear campaign about Mrs Kazan was so wrong. Yet your were the person who wrote a letter to the editor about Mr Monteyne and Mr Bubba saying how wrong it was for the them to take an endorsement by the Community for Academic Excellence. I didn't see your name on the list of candidates. How do you know how Mr Ortiz was chosen? You want to see things change put your name on a ballot in November and run.
Resident Kelly
12:39 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
This is an absolute embarassament to the town. I really hope Wayne residents start to wake up. We are not in control of anything. We are being led by the nose. Waht a shame.
Justice
11:31 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Stewart. Maybe he is giving free haircuts.
Jack Q
12:39 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
What would your requirements be, Justice? You posted this recently "As far as PTO mom's go, unless they have worked and actually earned a living, budgeted, multi-tasked, this Board will continue to spend foolishly without restraint as it has done orbiting our Property Taxes. Not all, but some of these "moms" think that their husbands' name is Credit Card and the Citizens of Wayne are the Bank of Fools.
He's not a PTO mom, has his own business and you make fun of his profession! So in your opinion, women who don't work, people who have their own business and I believe you had a beef with the gentleman who work at a University should not volunteer. That, I think, eliminated every candidate. Who would you choose?
Justice
11:59 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
W.elk They were all on the net, not just Bob, who also did not run for the position.
Al Scala
12:39 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I googled this Robert Pignatello. His credentials are very impressive. He is a Senior VP at John Jay College in NYC. His responsibilities include oversight of Public Safety, I.T, Facilities Management, Human Resources, Finance and Business Services, Space Planning & Capital Projects, amongst a few others. Gee, you have to wonder why this guy wasn't selected.
Frank Gallagher
1:14 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
They interviewed him, they likely rejected him based on his interview, rather than his resume. That's appropriate.
stewart resmer
1:32 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
A.S. both you and EW really do raise some interesting questions.
Al Scala
1:41 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Frank....that is possible. However, you have to admit, his qualifications are extremely impressive. I think you also have to admit that having a person on the Board with that type of experience, would be beneficial. I would guess that Monteyne interviewed very favorably, after all they did appoint him. Look what happened to him! The Board ran away so fast from him this past election, he came in dead last in the votes. Let's hope this selection is better than the last one they made. I still say this Robert Pignatello's C.V. is very impressive. Frank, it is so obvious what you are here for. You are here to protect the board at all cost. I guess they just can't stand criticism, even on a constructive basis. What are they afraid of? You must be an insider. Please tell us. They were petrified of Cathy Kazan to the point they sent a sleazy letter out to the public to discredit Cathy. Are they afraid of the fact that Cathy championed transparency?
stewart resmer
2:18 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Al what you outline is exactly why honoring the next higher vote count would have been a more responsible way in which to appoint some one?
As you and EW say, these two particular individuals were eminently qualified to have served.
So what are we to take away then?
1st, that Mz Kingston knew she was leaving but remained silent during the election cycle so as to deprive the People of their franchise, this to me is reprehensible.
2nd. That in chosing a replacement, education, professional qualifications, experience, and merit is apparently judging by the outcome, is certainly not a factor.
3rd. The integrity and motivation of the board majority has been put in to question.
Frank Gallagher
6:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Al...we have been through this time and time again, but since you said "please", I will tell you again....I am not an insider, I don't represent the board, and I don't know that they are afraid of Kazan or anything along the lines of what you are suggesting.
The comments that I write are my own observations and opinions. Just because I disagree with you, doesn't make me an insider.
My observation is that the current board members did not and do not want your candidate on the board. My opinion is that is because she has been at odds with the board.
Jack Q
6:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Unfortunately, the system is the way it is. Not saying it is the best, but to quote you Stew, if you want it changed, pass a law. Until then, don't criticize the poor man who has barely accepted the position. Your argument is not with him. Who knows, he may be the voice of reason you so desire.
William
6:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
For those of you who are in the HR field we all know that resumes are nothing but a screening tool. Anyone can embellish a resume. The real test is the interview process it dosn't lie about a person. I have seen canidates who's resume would knock you off your feet but during the interview process you wonder if they are the same person on the resume.
I would be careful just judging from a resume
Justice
1:03 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
How about someone who actually RAN for office? What a novel idea? I believe that is a premise of the United States Constitution? Oh, I suppose they stopped teaching that by the time you went to school. Did you go to school? In the US? Did you serve your country? Did you shed your blood to protect the Constitution of the US? Has anyone on that Board done so?
Frank Gallagher
1:14 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Justice...what is your point about military service?
Are veterans the only people qualified to serve on the school board, or to comment on this forum?
Monteyne went to West Point, and fulfilled his service commitment, I don't see you sticking up for him.
Justice
1:09 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Frank, you have consistently avoided my question about serving in the military? Perhaps that is the reason that you cannot comprehend that the public positions are elected not appointed. You never served anyone except your narcissistic, misogynist self.
Frank Gallagher
1:41 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Right back to the name-calling? That didn't take long. When your weak argument collapses, name-calling is all that you have left.
Please be advised that many public positions are appointed.
Judges, for instance, are appointed, as are mid-term replacements for the Wayne BOE.
Can you comprehend that?
Justice
2:20 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Frank. Comprehend this: You were never military.
I don't think so
6:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Mr Pignatello was a council member and mayor Verona in the past. Chances are this was just a quick stepping stone for him. The last thing we need on the board is another politician that will jump ship as soon as he got the chance. If you read the resume, see the whole picture not just focus on the parts you like.
Frank Gallagher
7:32 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I find the political part of his resume most interesting.
Councilman, then Mayor of Verona...and then moves to Wayne???
That would be like our star councilman moving to Chicago, or our mayor moving to Kansas.
Robert Pignatello...what brings you to Wayne ?
Al Scala
9:40 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I don't think so....I guess I can't blame you for feeling that way. Here in Wayne we have a pretty good track record of our BOE members jumping to the Town Council or running for Freeholder. There have been quite a few. However to overlook Mr.Pignatello's qualifications and experience, is being a little shortsighted. I don't mean that in a mean spirited way.. I think having a person with the background such as he does, would be beneficial to the BOE, thus our children as well, not to mention us taxpayers. I have no idea how his interview went, I just find it interesting that they would pass on an individual with his experience. Maybe, there just wasn't enough room for him as well as one of our other Trustees who self admittedly concedes his ego at times is just too big for the room.
Justice
2:23 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Frank. Are you even man enough to have qualified for the military? All the negativity emanates from the agenda you are so miserably failing at. Learn the US Constitution first.
Frank Gallagher
6:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
What is the agenda that I am failing at?
Only men qualify for the military? Don't tell that to these soldiers:
http://www.army.mil/women/profiles.html
Chicken Little
6:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I just checked the list of qualifications for serving on the BOE. Serving in the military is not listed.
Anybody have the over/under on how many postings before this blog gets shut down?
Joe videodummy
6:01 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Congratulations R. Ortiz. I'm not sure of your professional credentials, but your qualifications of being a town resident, married, and having children attending our public schools is a vital asset over the board members that don't.
Having professional credentials may help you advance in your career, achieve recognition, and let you stand-out from the competition but,
After all of that, you still have to come home and hear about the things that made you decide to become a Board of Education- Board Member in your hometown. You have to hear from your children, first hand experiences about their teachers, their classmates, their friends and neighbors, their schools, while thinking to yourself " these are my people too" !!! It's a cool place to be. Good Luck.
Justice
6:12 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Frank. There you go again
.deflecting a statement for your own gains. Grow.up.
Frank Gallagher
7:02 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Justice....what gains do you mean?
Justice
7:11 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Frank. There you go. Playing the poor victim. Your sarcasm and deflections are well noted. You are truly a sandbox cyber bully.
C6
10:17 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Congratulations and good luck Mr. Ortiz!
Robert Pignatello
10:17 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
There are some very strong opinions here on the BOE's decision to fill the unexpired term. The Board has made their choice and everyone is entitled to have their say about it. But it is pretty obvious that some of the comments, whether from those using actual names or creative screen names to conceal their identity, are from those who have an agenda that supports the board's interest in the keeping the status quo. In this world, new ideas and people who might challenge theirs are not welcomed and are actively resisted.
Unfortunately, a few comments on my candidacy and interest in serving are being made without knowing much about me. Why the pre-judgment? Is it politics rearing its ugly head?
For the record, I have lived in Wayne for 18 years. Before moving to Wayne I served as a local official in Verona. My two daughters went through the Wayne school system from elementary school to high school and my step son is currently in middle school. Wayne is a great community. It has much to offer. My family and I have been very happy here for a long time. But, it amazes me how Wayne seems to be under the spell and dominance of partisan politics. The local school board is supposed to be non- partisan. But I'm not so sure. It's apparent that some will work very hard to hold on to maintaining tight control of decision making. That's not good for the rest of us. (cont'd)
Robert Pignatello
10:17 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
For the record, I don’t belong to either political party. My voter registration is "unaffiliated". I don’t have ties to any local special interests, individuals or political groups of any kind. I have not been involved in anything of a political nature for over 20 years focusing instead on family and professional career.
I have experience in managing a large educational institution as a college Vice President for many years. This includes managing a budget of over $90 million, Public Safety, HR (I know a great about resumes and interviews too. I hire people all the time), Technology services and Facilities. I have been successful in bringing down administrative costs while supporting the preservation and enhancement of academic quality and services.
I care deeply about education. It's been my career. To me, helping to prepare high school students transition into college and write their own success story is a great cause to work for. I'm sure we can do even more to strengthen ties with local colleges for our children.
Robert Pignatello
10:17 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Over the last couple of years it was hard not to hear and wonder about certain questionable BOE practices. And with over half our tax dollars going to finance education and how much we depend on it, this is serious business. I came forward and offered my services because I thought change was needed and that I could make a difference. I offered to help look at district expenses so we can be more efficient, to thoroughly examine management effectiveness, and reduce non academic costs, strive for continuous improvement, hold administrators accountable, to increase revenue in other ways than raising taxes and to keep our schools affordable. I have done this successfully. I thought if appointed I could hit the ground running and contribute.
I’d like to see more transparency and communications concerning board decisions. We need to build more support beyond traditional interest groups. What is the value proposition for Senior citizens, renters, those with no children, those whose children have graduated? Every citizen has a stake in the local education system. But it doesn't always feel that way to them.
I like to ask questions and challenge assumptions. That is clearly not what the board was looking for since candidates who stood for that were passed over. But that's what is needed in my view. In the end, the people will have the final say. That's what elections are for.
Chicken Little
10:48 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
@Rob Pignatello
You sound like a sore loser. If you are half as wonderful as you sound, how could they pass you up?! Did the board really tell you that they didn't want someone who asks questions and challenge assumptions? Come on.
William
9:03 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
As I previously stated resumes look wonderful on paper as does yours. It is obvious from your posting that the interview processes must have worked WELL !
Scondo
10:29 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Very nicel stated and I disagree with chicken little's assessment. Thank you for submitting yourself for consideration and hopefully I will have opportunity to vote for you in an actual election for BOE. Had you been appointed there is little doubt in my mind that you would have done exactly what you set forth above.
William
7:48 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Mr. Pignatello I would like to ask you if you were so passionate about getting on the BOE why did you not run in November ?
C6
11:07 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
I don't think he sounds like a sore loser at all. It's negative comments under this article as well as other articles that are most likely prompting him to make the public understand who he is. I give him lots of credit-1. he uses his real name not like the majority of people on patch including myself and 2. he tried to win a seat even though he would get negative (as well as positive) attention. Not a sore loser in my opinion-just a person trying to do good for our community. He didn't win, but that doesn't make him a loser.
Chicken Little
11:26 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
It sounds like he is bashing the board for not picking him, no?
Al Scala
9:03 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Chicken Little..,I don't think Robert Pignatello comes off as a sore loser at all. I think he is clear in his comments and assumptions. He obviously has a lot to offer, with a wealth of experience. Look him up on the John Jay College site, look at his job responsibilities. Are you telling me a man with a background in Human Resources, Public Safety, Information Technology, Facilities Management, Space Planning and Capital Projects, amongst others wouldn't be beneficial to the Board?. This man not only has public administration experience, ( John Jay is a member of the CUNY system), but has related educational administration experience. You seem to have a modicum of intelligence, so it surprises me to see your comments. It also surprises me why you don't see why they didn't pick him,
but then again, much like Frank, you seem to want to protect the current BOE franchise.The man thought he could make a difference. Do you find something wrong with that? What's wrong with keeping administrators accountable to increase revenue in other ways than raising taxes, keeping our education affordable? Do you really object to that? Having someone with Robert Pignatello's experience, would have been beneficial to many of the aspects of managing this school system. Mr Pignatello is certainly right when he says new ideas and people who challenge theirs are not welcomed and actively resisted.
Scondo
10:29 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
No, he is being very direct and civil he is not at all bashing anyone. And his approach is a breath of fresh air. I very much liked his explanation and his civility.
stewart resmer
6:55 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
It appears mother superior, the village idiot, chucklehead the clown, and shank gaggler have joined forces with the torch carrying, pitch fork shaking, hangmans noose brandishing crowd who were busy rampaging last night roaming the inter net looking for a release of their hostile aggression as they live in a continuous frenzy of hatred of political enemies and internal traitors, while they vicariously triumph over victories. The discontents produced by his bare, unsatisfying life are deliberately turned outwards and dissipated by such devices as the Two Minutes Hate, and the speculations which might possibly induce a sceptical or rebellious attitude are killed in advance by their early acquired inner discipline…at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to their collective stupidity, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction, in short, means protective stupidity.
An Adaption of 2 Minutes Hate by Orwell (applied locally)
Frank Gallagher
10:29 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
stewrat's worst enemy is his own nervous system. At any moment the tension inside him is liable to translate itself into some visible symptom...see above rant.
Chicken Little
10:29 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Stew
You truly are enamored with the sound of your own voice. Do you read your posts to yourself, over and over again?
W.elk
9:03 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
So basically Mr. Pignatello is a professional in this area. He has the credentials and given his position he has probably aced an interview or two in his career.
Individuals aside, is this kind of thinking really serving the best interests of the town? It's like having an all volunteer legal board in Wayne and choosing a real estate agent instead of a lawyer. It's like having a volunteer Medical Board and instead of picking a doctor, you pick the guy who has a pizzeria.
Seems very irresponsible. I am going to have to pay more attention to the candidates and the elections, who makes up the board and what they are trying to accomplish.
stewart resmer
9:11 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
stop making sense, it annoys the partisans
Al Scala
9:37 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
W.elk.......excellent point! Thank you!
Jack Q
10:29 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Wow, Stew! For the past two weeks you were crying for the voice of the people to be respected and put in Ms. Kazan. Now you think someone who didn't run would make a good candidate? You are such a hypocrite it's not even funny anymore. And you cry about partisanship. What a joke you are.
stewart resmer
11:09 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
jack-O...the credentials of the individuals are clearly impressive, its just that Mz Kasan had the mandate of 7000 voters, you seem to have an issue with that.
Thats your problem, get over it, move on is my best advice.
Except for the mob you consort with, every one else has. In the emantime this ones for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAkOLYpXGMc
Jack Q
11:48 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I don't have an issue with Ms Kazan. My problem is yours and Justice's moving targets of requirements and approvals. And you are the last person to call anyone mean. You've been called out on that many times. Specifically when you have run out of arguments. Therefore, you your own advice and move on.
stewart resmer
11:58 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
beat it jack yer boring
Jack Q
1:39 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Good one Stew. Maybe you should beat it back to California.
stewart resmer
2:12 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
oh no, I am having too much fun annoying republicans here thx
Frank Gallagher
2:43 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
stewrat admits to being partisan....open mouth...insert foot.
Jack Q
4:32 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Everyone is partisan, except Stew.
Al Scala
9:31 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
After reading Mr. Pignatello's post, It is abundantly clear why he wasn't chosen. He offered help to look at District expenses so they could be more efficient and reduce non academic expenses. Gee, why wouldn't they want him to do that? He stated he likes to ask questions, challenge assumptions. Question the Board? Are you kidding me? He'd like to see more transparency! That comment had them tossing their cookies. Unfortunately, he said all the right things, things they obviously didn't want to hear. He was apparently too qualified, probably more so than any other trustee on the Board. That scared the daylights out of them. You know who lost here? The children and we taxpayers.
Chicken Little
10:29 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Al,
I agree, that his credentials are very impressive. Does it not make you wonder why the board did not pick him? It seems practically like he could be superintendent. There is something none of us are seeing here, and it is too cynical to simply chalk it up by saying that the board does not want transparency, accountability, etc...
I get the impression - from his posting of his "resume" and his sour grapes statement about the board not wanting to take him up on his offer to be a guiding light - that he went into the interview expecting to be handed the job.
Frank Gallagher
11:48 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
If you review his previous comments, he insulted the board right before his interview.
After that, he could not have realistically expected to be appointed by them.
Chicken Little
1:39 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Frank
I don't see where he insulted the board before the interview. What are you reading that makes you conclude that he did?
But I will say, after re-reading his posts, that he opened by charging the board with maintaining the status quo. I don't know what he means by that, and that sounds precisely like the sort of thing that a candidate says when he is trying to get elected. A lot of good has happened in the district the past year, and I think the old, tired charge that the board only wants to maintain the status quo is a bit simplistic (and sour grapes).
Al Scala
2:29 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I certainly hope he does become a candidate. Personally, I don't know the man, but his credentials are very impressive.
Frank Gallagher
2:29 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Click onto his name, that will bring you to a page with all his previous comments. Look for the comment starting with "Keep"...he posted it twice.
Bill
1:39 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing. Looks like people had to wash their hands after shaking Bob's.
Al Scala
2:29 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Frank....I have read Mr Pignatello's comments several times. Where and how did he insult the Board right before his interview? We're you there? Are you a Board member posting under a fictitious name? There is no way you can construe that he insulted the Board members by his comments. If during his interview he offered or suggested something and it "bruised" some egos, which there are plenty of on the Board, then so be it. Maybe they need their egos bruised more often. You're simply posting "stuff" to discredit Mr Pignatello and I'm not sure why! Frank...nothing personal here but something is just not right with your posts. You can try to assure me here all you want. Your here for a purpose and with an agenda! If that's what it is, then so be it. You're certainly entitled to post what you want. It's just very obvious as to the nature of your posts.
Frank Gallagher
2:43 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Al...I pointed CL to the insulting post above. Check it out for yourself, then get back to me. I copied and pasted the quote earlier, but it was not approved.
Nothing personal ?...yet you are pretty quick to attack me.
Al Scala
4:32 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Frank....my apologies. I did not see the post where you say you copied and pasted the article. I did read what you referred to. It certainly is possible that the Board took that position. Notwithstanding that, he does have impressive credentials and there is little doubt in my mind that he could have been a constructive member of the Board, had they let him.
Frank Gallagher
4:32 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Al...are you asking how I know that Pignatello insulted the board?
I read his post on Patch and surmised it.
Frank Gallagher
5:36 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I copied and pasted the quote directly from his Patch history page and submitted it.
It never posted, I got an email advising that it was not approved.
It appears that the moderator allows the comments to build up, then reviews them and approves a bunch of them all at once, that's why we see many posts all displaying the exact same time.
Don't know why name-calling insults regularly get approved, but a direct quote from a candidate does not get approved.
Maybe Dan Hubbard could explain that here.
Al Scala
4:32 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
If you notice, Cathy Kazan has not jumped into the fray here or posted a comment. She has taken the Board's decision gracefully and with class. Will she be deterred by this result? I doubt it. It wouldn't surprise me to see Cathy still attend meetings, voice her opinion and pro-actively stay involved with Board matters from a public perspective. In fact I sincerely hope she runs again.
Really9
8:24 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Oh please Al, anyone can post under any name. You have no idea who is and is not posting. And if anyone says they only post under their real name-I have a bridge to sell you.
Al Scala
10:13 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Really9 .....well, it looks like we have another shill.....YOU. What cabinet did you crawl out of? Did you just make up your name today? Certainly no history under this shill name. Take a hike. Get lost!
Daniel Hubbard
5:37 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Comments must be approved by me, or a member of our editorial staff, before they post.
stewart resmer
6:23 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I cant wait for the day that patch routes comments through facebook where true and correct real names are required.
Frank Gallagher
7:48 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Yeah we know J. Edgar Jr...so you can investigate everybody, compile a dossier, and post links to their addresses and phone numbers.
We've seen how you operate stewrat.
Nose Wayne
10:13 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
That's why people on here don't use their real name because a WHACKO like stew will stalk you and give your information out to everyone in the world. And don't say it's not true stew because you wanted to meet me down at the police station one day for going off in your usual tantrum.
stewart resmer
2:22 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
its usualy paranoid schizophrenics that use alter egos to vent suppresed latent hostilities that they cannot otherwise express, here of course it just right wing nut jobs who are too much the sissey cowards to reveal who they really are. but dont worry, this is the age of the inter net and there are very skilled hackers already working away to strip you of your false comfort zone.
expect them
I don't think so
7:24 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Al I agree with Mr Pignatello's credentials but when I read his comments the more I am convinced he would have been out before he was in. I watch and attend meetings all the time and I haven't seen him asking any questions. This was a classic case of political opportunity. He expected to be appointed and while he has qualifications he might have been counterproductive. Go back to when we couldn't hire a superintendent. Part of the problem was there were board members who believed they knew more than they did. I'm not saying we have the perfect administration but at this point we need to see what happens.
Al Scala
12:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I don't think so....I certainly don't want to counterpoint your comments. You can look at this several ways. Mr. Pignatello apparently has not been involved in any civil or political venue for about 20 years. He has expertise no doubt that would be beneficial to the Board. An opening arises and he may say, " hey, I can help" He's been at his job for about 15 years. He's accumulated a lot of experience that would be beneficial to the Board so he desires to jump in. He admittedly says with his experience and could hit the ground running immediately. Why not? I also learned that he is going for his Doctorate degree. I like that. That shows commitment. Despite all that has been said and done, in my opinion, this guy would have been a constructive member of the Board.
C6
12:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
What does his pay and other expenses have anything to do with trying to get on the Wayne BOE? It sounds like you know this guy 'Bob'-not the first time you put up the link so anyone who reads comments can see what he makes. However, out of curiosity of what you are talking about, I did look it up through your link but his name never appeared.
Justice
4:14 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
C6. I do not know this guy "Bob". Everything is public on the net. As a matter of fact, given enough time, I am sure we will find out why he was run out of Essex County with his tail between his legs????
Al Scala
5:20 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Justice....if you happen to know something about this gentleman, please share it with us. Making a comment about him being run out of Essex County is unsubstantiated, unless there is something that you can tell us. I'm certainly not beyond making a mean comment, but to say he was run out of somewhere is speculative without backup! By the way, which town were you run out of before coming to Wayne.
Justice
5:46 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Born and raised here. How about you? The question was previously raised as to why a mayor of Verona would apply for a board job in Wayne. Valid question. Perhaps your wife has one of his kids as a student? Or do you consider that a mean question?
Al Scala
12:18 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
Not at all. Don't get huffy, I'm just joking with you. No, I was not born and raised here. I was born and raised in Paterson. My wife and I have lived here for about 26 years. And no, she never had any of his children.
Robert Pignatello
10:48 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
The personal attacks and innuendo here don’t do anything to make our schools better,address rising taxes, balance any budget, make us a stronger community or address what we want the BOE to accomplish.I think most people see through it for what it is.
To set the record straight, I have a master degree in management and I am studying for a Doctorate. I sought elective office at the age of 25.That was in 1985. It was a great experience that taught me a lot. I'm proud of the work I did. I ran three times. Won twice and lost once. A few years later we started to raise children. Eventually we chose to move to Wayne for personal and family reasons 18 years ago. You don't make an important life choice like that for political reasons.
I have had no interest or activity in party politics since those days.I registered as an Independent many years ago.I thought that getting involved with the BOE would be a chance to serve again.This time where I could bring my experience in education to bear and work with others to create a better,more efficient and affordable school system – in a non-partisan environment where fair minded people could openly deliberate, disagree and be civil about it.
I have attended a few meetings this year and there is certainly much to observe, learn and absorb.I plan on attending more upcoming meetings.For those of you who are interested in the direction of our schools and would like to talk, I will see you there and look forward to hearing your views.
I don't think so
11:51 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Mr Pignatello I would suggest you run for a seat on the board in November. There will be 3, 3 year terms and 1, 1 year term. Then it will be in the hands of the town voters not the board.