Board Being Sued for Denying Pines Lake Application
Homeowners wanted to divide a 30,000 square-foot property into two smaller lots and build a house on one of the lots.
The Planning Board is being sued for denying an application to subdivide a Pines Lake lot into two smaller properties.
A complaint has been filed in superior court against the board and township regarding the board denying Frederick and Barbara Habeeb’s application to split a 30,000 square-foot lakefront property into two separate lots.
The complaint states: “The actions of the defendants, the township, and its planning board were arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable.”
The board was scheduled to discuss the ongoing litigation at a meeting on Monday in closed session.
The Planning Board voted to deny the application in September.
The homeowners want the denial “set aside and declared null and void.”
The Habeebs wanted to divide their property into a 16,000 square-foot lot and 14,500 square-foot lot. The Habeebs live in a house on part of the property while an adjacent portion of the property remains vacant. They want to construct a new home on the property.
“I just thought the township didn’t give its due regard,” said Gerome Vogel, the lawyer representing the Habeebs. “I don’t think the decision is consistent with the way the neighborhood has been developed and I thought that the proposal we put forth, given the lots and the size of the lots in the area was acceptable.”
Properties in Pines Lake average approximately 15,000 square feet in area. The neighborhood was created between 70 and 80 years ago. Many of the homes were originally hunting cabins.
An ordinance approved in 1960 stipulates that new properties in Pines Lake must be at least 30,000 square feet in area.
At a meeting in September, residents said they were concerned that having two smaller lots so close to the lake sets a bad precedent despite the fact that most the properties on the street are approximately the same size.
Vogel argued that the larger lot that exists now “damages” the neighborhood more than the two proposed small lots would. He said the subdivision would have been “fair, reasonable, and consistent with what’s there now and what will always be there in that area.”
— Have a question or news tip? Contact editor Daniel Hubbard at Daniel.Hubbard@patch.com or find us on Facebook and Twitter. For news straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.
Flood Plain
12:11 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013
The residents thought that they could make a quick buck at the expense of all their neighbors. Now there will be nothing but lawyers' fees being generated and no one will win.
Pad
3:14 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013
Especially the taxpayers who wil foot the towns legal bills and also pay for any settlement one way or the other.
Bill
3:43 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013
If in fact the complaint was filed with Superior Court in Passaic County, as opposed to Federal Court; the plaintiff's may have a problem, especially if it is to be heard in Chancery Court. I recommend they ask around as to the well known reasons why.
Justice
4:09 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013
What's the problem with Chancery Court in Passaic County?
C6
10:59 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013
If there is already an ordinance that was set in the 60's that properties have to be at least 30,000 square feet in Pines Lake, WHY are they suing the town if they don't have this amount of space???? Am I missing something?????
Ron
11:26 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013
If the ordinance states that a lot must be 30K feet, then why are they going against that with their 16 and 14K proposal? Sounds like a greedy, money-making scheme at the expense of the neighborhood. Shame on them
EMAP
2:52 pm on Sunday, March 17, 2013
Pines Lake has been forever altered by recent over-building, removing trees and poor drainage. The 1960's law on the books was meant to protect the Community and the natural surroundings long before the property was purchased by this couple. They should have done their homework, not sue. Enough is enough!