patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Bear Hunt Begins for Third Year in NJ

DEP said bear sighting reports are down 34 percent from last year.

 

New Jersey's third annual bear hunt began Monday, with the first black bear brought in as part of the hunt killed in Sussex County.

The bear, a 165-pound male, was three years old and was not lured by hunters, according to The Record. The second killed bear brought in was a year-and-a-half old and was killed near Sparta.

The bear hunt, which is designed to help control the state's black bear population, will continue until Saturday and is held in conjunction with the firearm deer-hunting season. According to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), 469 black bears were harvested last year while 50,109 deer were harvested.

Bears are allowed to be hunted by licensed hunters with black bear permits, one bear per hunter, in zones in Morris, Sussex, Warren and northern Passaic counties. Other approved hunting zones include small sections of Somerset, Bergen and Hunterdon counties.

The weeklong bear hunt was approved as part of the state's Comprehensive Black Bear Management Policy in 2010. NJDEP estimated between 2,800 and 3,000 black bears were living in northwestern New Jersey this year, down from approximately 3,400 in 2010.

This year, more than 6,500 black bear hunting permits were issued.

"We are working to stabilize and reduce the state’s black bear population, to eventually be maintained at a density that minimizes human/bear conflicts, provides for a sustainable population within suitable bear habitat, and minimizes movement of bears to unsuitable habitat in suburban and urban areas,’’ Dave Chanda, director of the DEP’s Division of Fish and Wildlife, said in a press release.

While bears have seemed to be somewhat of a nuisance to some New Jersey residents this year, state officials said last week bear sightings are down, when compared with last year, by 34 percent; nuisance and damage complaints are down by 26 percent and dangerous bear incidents are down by 43 percent through the end of October.

There have been no bear-human incidents in more than two years, according to the DEP.

Bears are typically not aggressive toward humans according to Larry Ragonese, a spokesman for the NJDEP.

"It's very rare that a black bear attacks a human being in New Jersey," he said. "Some people think black bears are like grizzly bears but they're not."

Should bears be hunted in New Jersey? Participate in our poll below and let us know your thoughts in the comments.

  • Should bears be hunted in New Jersey?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        30 (46%)
    • No
        35 (53%)
    Total votes: 65
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Bear Hunt, NJDEP, black bears, and new jersey bear hunt

Donny

6:35 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

NJ has the best biologists watching over our wildlife.People who are against all hunting need to educate themselves about the populations of these animals in the past century.Deer,Turkeys, and Bears numbers are higher now than any time in the last 100 years.They are a renewable resource and if managed properly we will have healthy populations far into the future.People who act on emotions are not a friend to our wildlife.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NJRealist

2:17 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

I hear these "best biologists" are HUNTERS-youre a joke!

grace

3:32 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Bears were here first before people built their homes . Can't you find some other sport to keep you occupied. What about tranquilizing them and moving them away to another place if they are annoying. Its a dam shame to kill a beautiful animal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Frank Santorella

9:15 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

If more people remained in the cities, there would be more room for bears in suburban and rural areas. You can help preserve these beautiful animals by moving back to the city. Just my suggestion.

Comment_arrow

Patch Rapscallion

11:23 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Great point Frank, I totally agree! Rearranging your entire life around bear preservation is definitely not a terrible idea. I say we go one step further – if everyone in the United States would just move to Columbus, Ohio (I’ve done the math folks, it will be tight, but we can all physically fit), this would leave the rest of the continental United States to its rightful owner: yep, you guessed it: the Bears.

Comment_arrow

DD6479

12:05 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Patch Rapscallion ...You have a point...I think we can all squeeze into one state (they have been squeezing people into Jersey for years) however the rightful owners of the country are the Native American Indians....We should let them take over the country...of course they themselves will probably kill the bears for food and fur .....Face it Bears....your screwed!

Comment_arrow

Dena Porambo

12:42 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

I TOTALLY agree with you Grace. It seems to me that there are more humans that are a nuisance then defenseless creatures. So what do we do about the human's that are overpopulating the area???? hummmm

Comment_arrow

Scondo

3:08 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Your supposition is factually incorrect. The actuality is that the bears territory has been expanding as the population of bears increases. Bears drive the younger bears out of their territory and into areas habitated by humans, it is not the other way around and the younger bears travel to places like Bergen County, where the homes have been for 100 years. A mature male can travel a range of up to 80 square miles., and can easily traverse a linear distance of 35 miles per day.

Comment_arrow

Joann Appleton

11:09 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

I'm with you grace. I believe they should be moved, not killed. As you said, they were here first and are just trying to cope with the increased human population. I've had bears numerous times in my yard and they have not been aggressive.
Joann

RICHARD LEMBKE

7:11 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Who wants to eat 300 LB Raccoon that feeds on garbage , Why not have a permit for TAGGED bears only . No real sportsman would shoot a cub or a mother bear with cubs .

Reply

Pete Stagg

7:37 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

It is my opinion that while bear sitings are down, that is simply because people are more used to seeing them around and not bothering to report it. It is my experience that I am seeing more bears. I love watching them, but of course, do not enjoy cleaning up the mess they sometimes make. Life always involves a tradeoff.

Reply

Liberty

9:56 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

I think if you live in a bear's habitat, ie: rural Jersey, you should adapt. Take the proper precautions--keep garbage cans in the garage, etc. They are fun to watch. When there is a bear-human incident, it's because the human provoked the bear, or a mother bear was protecting her cubs. It's sad that we think we can move into an area and make the pre-existing animal populations adapt to us--by killing them.

Reply

Pete

11:12 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Bear meat's good, but NOT if the bear's been dining on garbage. At that point it tastes like -- guess what ? -- GARBAGE.

This hunt has very little to do with sport -- it's simply a question of reducing the bear population to a point where they don't interfere TOO much with people.

Reply

MR

1:43 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

It's not a bear hunt. It's a bear ambush. These hunters do not track a bear. It's a total massacre.. I would not call these people hunters. If you want to hunt go to Pennsyvania or NY State. It's all about revenue for NJ. It's all about paying the fish and game commission.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Involved Hopatcong Mom

1:59 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Bear license is $2.00, not much of a revenue source. Not sure why people forget WE are also part of the circle of life. Nature is a a series of checks and balances, and one of them is predation.

Comment_arrow

Scondo

3:10 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

And the last time you were in the woods was ?

Comment_arrow

Liberty

3:52 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Mom, so all these hunters that are preying on bears, are going to eat them? We are not part of nature's circle of life--we go to the store and buy chicken and beef that has been bred for food. Not a lot of bear meat at the A&P.
And Scondo, you don't think there were bears in Bergen County over a hundred years ago? The animals were here before people, so,now people are expanding their territory and the animals are in the way--so we kill them!

Comment_arrow

Involved Hopatcong Mom

10:14 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

We were in the woods this week. All the animals we kill go for food. Just because you outsource your killing, doesn't mean something isn't being killed. Do you honestly believe there is a difference between killing a wild or domestic animal? The only difference is WHOSE hands get dirty. We do live in Sussex county. Rural communities hunt. Always has been.

NJRealist

2:20 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

ANYONE WHO WOULD KILL A BABY ANY ANIMAL IS SICK IN THE HEAD!!

Reply

NJRealist

2:23 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

More people against the bear hunt than for it....so why is it still happening?? THis is a thrill kill trophy slaughter!!!!

Reply

jea9

3:45 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

The problem is our garbage, which is full of all those steriods and preservatives. Bears would much rather eat that then berries in the woods. Because of this they are having 4 to 5 cubs each year instead of 1. The town has asked over & over again to put your garbage out the morning of pick up not without even a lid the night before. I agree they are beautiful animals when they are in someone else's yard. I haven't had a bird feeder out in years and I put my garbage out the morning of pick up, but three times I've had a bear try to get in my house. Why, because I have parrot & the bear can smell a 1/2 cup of bird seed in my house. So now I can not open a window on my first floor. Like I said they are nice to look at in someone else's yard, not face to face at your window.

Reply

AcTwisted

4:31 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

hunters will hunt whatever NJ FIsh & Game allows....... deer, bear, fox, coyote, geese, ducks, rabbits, etc. If Fish & Game determines you can't hunt them, then guess what?? they'll be protected like bobcats. the bear population must be healthy enough to warrant another hunt this year

Reply

David

6:15 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

It should only be called a 'sport' if the animal was able to hunt you with a gun as well. It is slaughter, not hunting, since the animal has no chance to fight back against someone using a gun or bow.

Reply

mamo

2:41 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

It is inhumane for those evil hunters with those big guns to kill these poor animals. They should be protected like other species. For instance, look at the nearly extinct -- but now THRIVING "NJ Monkey". When their habitat was restricted to the inner cities, their population rapidly increased (most probably that can be correlated with an increase in welfare and foodstamps). When they stray from their neighborhoods and prey on decent folk, they get put down like most diseased animals should.

Reply

hani

8:27 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The word "hunt" is incorrect. It should be called the bear slaughtering! Killing pure, innocent animals because they make a mess once in a while? Makes no sense!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

bayboat

9:31 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

People dont hunt them because they make a mess.
They hunt them because they are DELICIOUS and you get a great rug!
Hunting to eat AND decorate your house DOES make sense.

Dubby

11:25 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

A limited bear hunt to keep the population in check and provide sport hunting opportunities in NJ is perfectly fine. That being said I moved near the woods because I like it here, there are suppose to be bears in the woods. I see them all the time and am not afraid of them. I dont think they are a threat to people at all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bayboat

7:11 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Dubby..you say, "I see them all the time and am not afraid of them"
You should be.
Dubby...you say, "I dont think they are a threat to people at all."
If a female has cubs nearby and is startled by you..youll be having a closed casket funeral because they wont be able to find all the pieces.
We're not talking about Winny the Pooh.

Comment_arrow

FourScore

10:38 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

So you think the solution is to kill mamma bear and her cubs because there are people out there who are too stupid to know that you never come between ANY animal and its offspring???

Frank LaRocca

12:53 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

I am all for the hunt! I did not climb to the top of the food chain to let any animal take over. Hunt the bears & the deer. I don't care if they were here first. There is plenty of room for the bears and the deer, right next to my mashed potatoes!

Reply

Frank LaRocca

12:54 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

In all seriousness, I agree with a "controlled" limited hunting season to help thin the herd. Just be careful, and be safe.

Reply

Sylvia hoffmAn

8:58 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

These individuals who kill defenseless bears especially cubs are disgusting and nothing more than bullies. It's a shame we can't arm the bears. We've lived in northern NJ for 15 years have bears walk thru our yard and never have had a problem. If you don't bother them they won't bother you. Lets remember we moved into their area. Who are we to decide to eliminate them

Reply

Bryan

10:39 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

A truly responsible hunter wouldn't kill a female Bear with cubs, or any cub for that matter. I am not a hunter, however I do support this hunt and any responsible hunter that engages in it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FourScore

10:57 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

And if a female happened to be away from her cubs at the moment, you would know she had cubs how???

Comment_arrow

Dan Grant

1:32 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012

The term "responsible hunter" is an oximoron.

Woody

11:14 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012

These bears are true EVIL and should be destroyed! I have personally witnessed bears attack babies in strollers for no reason. The babies begged for their lives but the bears continued their onslaught. Several of my family members have been killed by these nasty nasty animals.Disgusting creatures, kill them all

Reply

Leave a comment