patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Average Homeowner's School Taxes Could Increase $205

Education officials discussed the district's preliminary budget at a special meeting Wednesday. The proposed tax levy is $132.2 million.

 

The school portion of the average homeowner’s tax bill could increase $205 if the Board of Education approves the 2013-14 budget.

Board members offered a presentation on the district's proposed budget at a special meeting Wednesday at Wayne Hills High School (a copy of the presentation has been attached to this article.) If adopted as proposed, a $132.2 million tax levy would support the overall spending plan.

“Nothing is set in stone yet,” district Superintendent Ray Gonzalez said.

The proposed tax levy increase is $4.9 million above the $127.3 million raised to support the current school district budget, a 3.8 percent increase.

The tax levy would have to be $129.8 million to be at a 2 percent increase, the maximum allowed under the state-mandated cap. Homeowners, assessed at the township average of $229,000, sustained an average $127 property tax increase under the 2012-13 spending plan.

Gonzalez said Wednesday that fixed costs are the greatest driver of the 2013-14 budget. Salaries and benefits could increase from $84.3 million to $86.5 million and $31.4 million to $34.1 million, respectively. Overall fixed costs, including utilities, could rise 4.6 percent from $130.3 million to $136.3 million under the spending plan, with discretionary costs of $5.7 million bringing the proposed expenditures to $142 million.

According to the presentation, the district’s total expected revenues would be $139.5 million, with $129.8 million of the tax levy and $9.7 million in other revenue, such as summer school fees, Medicaid reimbursements and similar line items. The district has not yet been informed of its state aid award, which was $3.8 million last year.

Gonzalez emphasized that the figures in the presentation are not firm and could change before the budget is approved in March.

Officials will give another public presentation at Wayne Valley High School at 7 p.m. March 14. The board is scheduled to adopt the budget at a special meeting March 27. The budget will then be sent to the county superintendent for final approval.

— Have a question or news tip? Contact editor Daniel Hubbard at Daniel.Hubbard@patch.com or find us on Facebook and Twitter. For news straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.

  • Do you think the preliminary tax levy of $132 million is too much?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes. We don't need higher taxes.
        26 (89%)
    • No, our kids come first and deserve the best education we can give them.
        3 (10%)
    Total votes: 29
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Wayne Board of Education

John Smith

8:01 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

There has been so much property value reduction during the last years in Wayne, that the taxes cannot go but up. According to statements made by Dorothy Kreitz, the highly able assessor, she was surprised that the property values have been reduced so much. I do not believe that she has been sleeping at the wheel. Quite the opposite, these individuals are very canning. They intentionally over assessed the properties so that they collect so much more money in salaries and benefits and special interest spending. These people even charged the homeowners for the ice skating lessons of their children. Enjoy!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack Q

12:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Except this is the school budget, not the town budget. Salaries, benefits and technology drive these costs. So all the people who cry that the school system is deteriorating, don't cry that we are investing more money in the schools.

Comment_arrow

John Smith

1:05 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

It is a school budget, but the mayor has the final authority. He can veto the budget, if it violates the constitutional requirement for uniformity of taxes. But he does not.

The school taxes are state taxes for the use of the state. As such, the taxes must be uniform throughout the state.

However, in the corrupt state of New Jersey, every local government can and does levy at will whatever they want to charge the property owners. Thus, Wayne charges significant amounts for "special" children, while very few localities can do that. They have been ripping off the homeowners for many years.

Bill

12:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Salaries stagnant for the private sector. Who can afford this?

Reply

Bobtwo

12:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Doesn't matter how you vote taxes will continue to go up. More benefits for teachers and administrators, less for citizens.

Reply

Julie Ritsema

12:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

While I highly value Education and our Wayne Schools, I question in a tough economy, when is it enough? My tax bill has gone up $2,500 in the last five years. A person on a fixed income can not continue to afford to live here. We need to do better!! We need more fiscal accountability. The sky is NOT the limit anymore.

Reply

wyldthang18

12:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Just what we need, more money taken out of our pockets unnecessarily just because they can. You want more money go find it elsewhere because my paycheck sure as heck can't afford to be squeezed anymore. By the way why do I pay the same as people who actually have kids in school, or have kids at all? Shouldn't people whose kids are actually in these schools or have young kids who will eventually be in these schools pay more than me when I don't have any? There should be some type of tier program based on how many you have to correlate to what you pay.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DaveG

3:01 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

For the same reason that people who don't drive pay taxes to maintain roads - and peolpe who don't go to the library support the libarary and peopel who don't go the parks pay for them. They are public programs that benefit the public.

Comment_arrow

Scondo

3:45 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

The BOE, needs to be in tune to the idea that tax base is eroded and the standard of living within the town is diminished and every effort must be made to not have a budgetary increase at all. Howver,some of the increase may be in the nature of benefit programs that are uncontrollable. So a thorough explanation should be had so that the public is satisfied that all effort to control cost have been explored. If some programs need to be cut, so be it. As the town has aged , it may no longer be appropriate to provide all manner of programs for a small segment.

Comment_arrow

Bobtwo

5:53 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

You know Dave G this is a democracy. How many times has the school budget been voted down only to have the council and whoever restore it or only cut less than 1% from the school budget. The roads and parks do not receive constant maintenance or annual pay increases as the school system does. The library does not take 50% of my real estate taxes. To be sure the public programs benefit the public. I can sit in the park or use the library. Can I sit in the school or walk around the building or eat in the cafeteria? Where is the benefit.
I for one am getting tired of hearing people defend the school system with out any consideration for the majority.

Comment_arrow

DaveG

4:41 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

Here is the reason Bob. The NJ Constitution mandates that every child receive a thorough and efficient education. If the voters (or the council's) treatment of the budget woud result in something less, the Commissioner can simply change it. The majority can't cicumvent the mandate. Push to get people on the Board who will make the system run more efficiently. Find ways to find non-tax revenues to supoprt the schools. Elect state politicians who will stop mandating programs in the schools without paying for them and leaving the local boards to pay the freight. Iinsist that all public employees earn their salaries and support ways to limit benefits or require greater employee contribution.

Joe videodummy

12:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Regarding Mr. Gonzalas comment: "Nothing is set in stone". The 2% increase is set in stone. We can squabble about 2 million ( about $30.00 per homeowner ) but the 2% is "Auto-Bill Pay".
Knowing this, why not propose a 3 year budget plan, by including the annual 2% increase and lay the cards on the table.
This way, these budget meetings could be used to to discuss how to use the surplus of funds left over from the previous budget before the end of each school year. The budget would incluse the treasured line items like "breakage, reductions in transportation costs, budget cuts in textbooks, building services, maintenance budget cost, and the Grail- the Additional General Administration Salaries.
Since the rise in taxes will be almost $700.00 in the next 3 years, and will have risen to over 1200.00 if you include the past 2 years, it's obvious that we're beyond asking "how and why" and should concentrate on "for what".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe videodummy

6:11 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

figures are based on the minimum homeowner appraisal value of 229,000 which only exists on paper, or when a home is earmarked for a Fema buy-out.

stewart resmer

1:28 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Ortiz has driven up tha taxes already! see? there you go!

Reply
Comment_arrow

William

5:20 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Mr. Resmer why dont you move out of Wayne becuase all you do is complain

Justice

5:50 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Why don't all the sheep with blinders on move out of Wayne? All they do is accept.

Reply

stewart resmer

5:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Because I have alot of work to do liberating the oppressed masses from the tyranny of the majority who have run Wayne as though it were a private club of patronage, political cronyism, and election rigging to the distinct detriment of the People?
Thank you for asking.

Reply
Comment_arrow

C Bacio

9:13 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Perhaps you can spare some of your excessive spare time teaching the Wayne Democratic Party what constitutes a respectable candidate running a viable campaign. Its unfathomable to think Republican candidates continue to win election after election with so little meaningful opposition from the Democratic party! Why is that? Why would a party who obviously knows what is best for the electorate, country and the earth for that matter have such a meaningless presence in Wayne?

Comment_arrow

stewart resmer

7:15 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

oh bacio, lets start with the history of council member appointments, which I view as a little like covering the bag in baseball?
Don't think I havent noticed the count time and again?
Ask yourself, how many council memebers on the dais today were appointees first, hmmm? Never mind, dont ask.
I call for the town charter to be changed so that an end is put that lil stunt. Just like the school board business of late.
All we need right now is for just one more current sitting council person to step down leaving a seat open for yet another appointment to defy the laws of averages?
The ward form of elections is a throw back to medievel London and it assures that ward boss style politics of patronage and cronyism prevails and that describes Wayne to a T, when the vast majority of elections across the US are open elections.
The dems can account for themselves, me? I am a SPEC-Socially progressive, economic conservative.
I assume you hail from the party of stupid right?

raised in wayne

6:11 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

The increased cost of benefits should be passed on to the employees, not the taxpayers. Benefits are not an example of "investing in the schools."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bobtwo

12:18 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

This is one of the most reasonable responses that I have seen.

Comment_arrow

Jack Q

10:48 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

I agree with you, but I'm sure there is something contractually that prohibits that.

Pad

10:48 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

I have said this before. The Wayne BOE is out of control with salaries and hiring. Did we really need a new middle school? Do we need to be running our own school bus fleet? Outsourcing this would probably save alot of money and cost. They need to make cuts. Administration has too many administrators and they are always creating new positions. $127.00 tax increase really translates that most people will end up paying much more then that. They have no buisness proposing a budget that is ove the state mandated 2%. They should start at 2% and then make cuts. They propose an inflated budget, then make cuts and act like they did the taxpayers a big favor. They end up with what they wanted all along. The BOE members hae to go and be replaced by members that are responsive to the taxpayers in this town not just the teachers union and its high paid administrators. The BOE needs to make cuts. When budgets were defeated the Township council made frivilous cuts less then 1%. Now they have taken the taxpayers vote away. Believe me taking our vote away didn't do the taxpayers any favor. This was all in thier best interest.

Reply

Adam Smith

10:48 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

My paychek has bben stagnant since the recession started 5 years ago. But my property tax has been steadily increasing over that same period. When will this government start to live like an ordinary citizen?

Reply

Adam Smith

10:48 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

Well, if this government is serious about cost cutting, then close Preakness Library Branch, freeze salary, and close down the programs that don’t have enough students. Is this government willing to do the best for the people of the town or just for themselves?

Reply

Chicken Little

10:48 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

That will not happen soon, but eventually. We are moving further and further away from the days when you had to offer tax payer-funded benefits to public employees in order to attract talent away from the more lucrative private sector. That rationale is becoming more and more tenuous.
It is beginning to happen, though. Teachers are paying a portion of their salaries towards their health insurance, and the percentage which they pay will increase. Eventually, pensions will be go, too, and public sector employees will join the rest of us who throw our money into a 401K or IRA.

Reply

Julie Ritsema

12:35 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

They don't want to make cuts...that is obvious, and honestly, I'm not sure if this increase actually will benefit the student...I do question that on occasion. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS are through the roof, and there is the very real reality that teacher's and staff will have to contribute more for benefits, but that isn't all on the BOE, that's the reality of our future. Companies are doing away with pensions, and cutting back on benefits period. Pension won't even be a word in my children's vocabulary. It was a very nice benefit, that costs money. I really think we all need to look into WHAT they actually want to do with the money, and WHAT the benefits are to OUR STUDENTS...NOT ADMINISTRATION!!!!

Reply

Al Scala

1:35 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

There comes a time when you have to say, enough is enough. Maybe we just have to hold tight for a year or so without implementing any new programs. Now, people will say that is putting our children farther behind by not getting the benefit of the newest and hottest educational programs out there. There is an argument for everything. Our children,s education is important and can be a very emotional issue. However, how much can the taxpayer bear. How many people out there have gone without a raise for several years, yet their property taxes have gone up. It's a difficult issue. The board, and I certainly don't envy them need to make some hard decisions that may not be very popular or politically adverse. There has got to be a balance between cost and a good education.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack Q

2:05 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

I don't understand why people say we are behind in anything. I see the work my kids are doing and it far exceeds anything that I was doing at that age. And your wife and the other teachers and adminisitrators are responsible for that. But when you start looking at costs, the biggest one for schools and any business is salaries and benefits. That is the third rail in this argument. Administrators will say teachers make too much, teachers will say there are too many administrators. There has to be a balance struck between the two. And believe me, I don;t envy the boards job either. It's a no-win situation.

Comment_arrow

Chicken Little

2:05 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

Your wife is a teacher, ask her. Let her explain to you how the State requires upgrades and changes in the educational programs, and other unfunded or underfunded mandates. (Not that I understand why; does geometry or chemistry change much from year to year?).

Bobtwo

4:41 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

I don't understand it. If the teachers and administrators don't receive an increase for a year or so why should the level of education be effected. If they have to contribute a bit more to their benefit package how does it effect their ability to teach. Am I missing something or is this all about money and not the children.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chicken Little

8:22 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

I think part of the problem is that people who go into teaching or other public employee jobs assume that they are making less than if they went into the private sector, and therefore expect certain benefits (such as yearly raises, even if only 1 or 2%) and other benefits. This attitude will change the longer the private sector is down, and the old rationale (the need to attract talent to the public sector by offering "perks") becomes less valid.
But, try to resist the urge to view this as "the teachers vs the children." Teachers are not greedy people, and the vast majority are by and large very dedicated and committed to their students. (No, I am not a teacher.)

Comment_arrow

Bobtwo

9:00 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

Many years ago it may have been true that public employees were paid less but that is not so for many many years.

Comment_arrow

You got it!

9:24 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Here is how it works...If you have been following Christie's changes to pension contribution as well as increase in social security contribution and then an increase in the percent of benefit contribution each year, you would understand that teachers bring home much less than was is on paper as their salary. Someone in a recent post mentioned the cost of educational programs that are required by the state...it all costs money. When you look at the line items for salaries and benefits it is lots of money; however, there are lots and lots of employees throughout this town. Someone mentioned about why there was a need for a third middle school. Clearly, many of you are ignorant and clueless to how over crowded these schools are. Teachers were let go last year so they could save money...but class sizes have increased tremendously. I put any of you to the test...come teach these students for 1 week under all the new curriculum demands, evaluation changes, laws governing children with needs and then understand why salaries and benefits are so important. Public education is the only profession where the town has a say as to what teachers earn. Lets not forget that with out educators your nor your children would be educated. People, possibly even you, moved to Wayne for the school system...correct? Once programs are taken away from our students, they are never given back. Shouldnt' we give our students the best? That's what they deserve

Al Scala

4:41 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

I can appreciate that the State has a job to do. However, coming down with mandate after mandate that necessitates our educational system doing something, which has an unfunded cost associated with it is unfair. The State has cut back our State Aid significantly under Christie. Wayne has gotten significantly less over the last 2 or so years. Frankly, I'm not sure what recourse we have. I guess we could vote the Governo out, however, I don't think that's going to happen this year.As for my wife, she really doesn't talk or complain about anything at all. Knowing I'm not adverse to getting on Patch and blasting somebody or the Board, she purposely doesn't discuss her work as a teacher in our school system. She has the highest regard for her fellow teachers, her Principal and Vice Principal, as well as the Superintendent and his Administrators. She loves her job. Whatever they throw at her, she does and does it without complaining.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chicken Little

8:22 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

.Mrs. Scala is like most of the teachers in Wayne. And I am thankful.

Justice

7:12 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

Al, your wife is a smart woman. You are fortunate.

Reply

Scondo

9:13 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Question: Does anyone know what the student population trend has been year by year over the last 10. I was told and I don't know if this is true that the population of school aged children has actually dropped in the last 10 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scondo

9:24 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

And as stated, the paper today The Record, Sunday confirmed what I said yesterday, I love when that happens because it causes Wayne Resident to pop a vein in his head. The loss of school age population alone suggest that spending needs to be curtailed. It is pretty dramatic for a town like Wayne.

Justice

9:28 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

C. Bacio, kiss yours. That is my response to your silly screen name and sarcasm.

Reply

Pad

9:24 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

As reported in The Record today there is a 15 to 30% drop in children under the age of 5 in Wayne according to the latest census. In turn school enrollment will be dropping in the years ahead. Did we really have to spend millions of taxpayer dollars for the new Anthony Wayne Middle School? They had to staff this school with teachers, administrators, support staff etc etc. I guess somewhere down the line one of the existing middle schools will be closed and sold and then resold so certain individuals can make alot of money on the deal as was the case with the old Anthony Wayne Middle School on Valley Road. When the new school was built they new future enrollment was gonna drop but they built it anyway. This contributed to a large increase in the yearly school budget. The BOE in this Township is destroying this town by its neverending need for more and more money. If the school budget is capped at 2% under state law where do they come off proposing an increase thats over 3.5%. Everytime taxes go up more people move out or cannot afford to maintain thier homes because all thier money is going to pay taxes. BOE members "WISE UP". Your killing the residents with your greed for more & more money.

Reply

Pad

9:24 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Daniel,
Why is my posting being removed? It is very relevent to the school budget increase as well as the loss of tax revenues in the Township. Please delete one of the two above as I didn't see the first posting when I looked. Thanks.

Reply

Justice

9:02 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

As a resident who was vehemently opposed to the construction of the Anthony Wayne Middle School, primarily due to the sale of the original Anthony Wayne Middle School to developers who made a fortune converting it to high end senior living quarters; consequently WASTING my money. Now a report that was mentioned by others on this board:
http://www.northjersey.com/community/family/parenting/NYC_beckons_new_parents_as_North_Jersey_suburbs_no_longer_seen_as_only_place_to_raise_kids.html

Who is this Anthony Wayne to be sold to once there are not enough children to attend? The property taxes have priced most young families out of the market, yet the taxes,continue to skyrocket with no end in sight. What will happen to all the people who were hired for the Anthony Wayne Middle School? Have the plans for downsizing begun or will the BOE continue to keep their heads in the sand and demand their 2% annual increase without voter input?

Reply

Bobtwo

9:45 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I am getting a little sick and tired of these arguments about the budget. Any of you that have made up budgets know that any budget can be cut by at least 10 - 15%. We put so much fat in to budgets to cover any and all contingencies it is not funny. Now in the case of municipal and state budgets this compounds year after year until no one knows what is in the budget. In private industry you have to hold your expenses or cut your waste. No one praises you when you increase your budget.

Reply

john colligan

10:14 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Here we go again taxpayers of Wayne when they tell you your school taxes are going up $205.00 that is far from the truth. In reality it will be much higher than that, add your municipal taxes and county taxes you can expect an increase of $1000.00 or higher. When will this end? Property taxes in Wayne are skyrocketing causing the average person unable to live in Wayne. Wayne Board of Ed was one of the first towns to eliminate township residents the right to vote on the school budget .P.S. Lets see how long this school superintendent will last???????

Reply

Pad

5:49 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Correct, to even propose a budget at 3.8% that is over the state mandated cap is ridiculous. They should start at 2% and cut from there. What goes on at the Wayne BOE is friends getting jobs and contracts etc. The BOE has killed the goose that laid the Golden Egg. And yes to take the budget vote way from the taxpayers was just another way around getting money. Most of the BOE members use the BOE as a stepping stone into politics. Just look at our town council almost all have served on the BOE and therefore the budget when defeated was cut less then 1% and approved by the governing body. Over a 132 million and they cut less then 1%?

Reply

Adam Smith

5:38 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

We were told that Anthony Wayne Middle School was built to meet the demand of incresing student population. In reality, the student population never really increased ever since the school was built.

Reply

Al Scala

6:04 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Anthony Wayne was built to relieve the overcrowding in our middle schools at the time...GW and Schuyler. I believe at the time both schools were either at 1000 students or possibly more. I think Schuyler has about 740 students at present and I think GW may be slightly less. Not sure what the student population is at Anthony Wayne.

Reply

Justice

6:22 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

What is being done to remove illegal students from the taxpayers back? I am not a charity. These students are not legal Wayne residents but use Wayne addresses to attend our schools. We all know who they are but what is being done?

Reply

Justice

7:02 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

To start with, the ones who live with relatives or friends in Wayne during the week while their parents live in other towns.

Reply

Justice

7:03 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

The ones who live in the many illegal apartments in town. There is code for this.

Reply

Justice

7:06 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

The next question? How is the reimbursement for Special Ed students from other towns allocated? It is income but how is it verified?

Reply

Justice

7:11 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

How about foster kids temporarily placed with Wayne residents? Those households get stipends why can't the taxpayers? Has anyone bothered to look into this? Grants? Superintendent of Prospect Park did his own grants until he died of a fatal heart attack. He lived on Point View. RIP to him. A true educator.

Reply

Leave a comment