patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Fate Of Controversial Chickens Rests With Judge

Municipal judge expects to rule by June 28 on whether resident Victor Alfieri can keep three hens on his property. Alfieri has championed getting the law changed so more people can own hens on smaller lots.

 

The fate of Victor Alfieri’s chickens is in legal limbo.

Alfieri, an advocate of sustainability, received a summons earlier this year for keeping three chickens on his property. Town law states that chickens can only be kept on lots two acres or larger. Alfieri owns about a quarter of an acre.

Alfieri appeared before municipal judge Lawrence Katz May 17 regarding the summons.

“I do believe that owning chickens should be regulated, but ultimately it comes down to the responsibility of the homeowner,” Alfieri said. “I feel like I’m raising these hens in a responsible way.”

Court Administrator Lori Ellicott said that Katz needed time to research the case and the law regarding the matter. She said Katz would issue his ruling by June 28.

Alfieri has had his three hens in his backyard for three years. The hens are kept in a multi-level coop inside a fenced-in chicken run. He insists the chickens are not loud or noisy, despite complaints from his neighbors to the contrary. Each hen lays about 300 eggs annually.

Alfieri insists that he not breaking the law by having the hens on his property. He said he has never been fined for owning the hens or told by anyone that he needs to get rid of them.

Alfieri has been trying for years to change the law to allow more people to own chickens, which he says are an important part of a leading a more sustainable lifestyle.

The council voted against an ordinance that would have decreased the minimum lot size from two acres to about one quarter of an acre, but council members said the new lot size was too small to support voting in favor of the change.

‘I’m not against chickens,” Councilwoman Lonni Miller Ryan previously said, “but I think we need to consider smaller lot sizes.”

The original ordinance governing the keeping of chickens on private property was approved in 1949. The lot size requirement was added to the law in 1958.

Alfieri contents that the law applies to commercial agricultural uses, not personal use. He said he has never sold or bred any chickens or eggs since owning the hens. He said that having large gardens, hens, and other animals was common when the law was created because the country was recovering from World War II.

“People look at some of these laws as if they were made today. This law was made a long time ago and things were different back then,” Alfieri said. “People wouldn’t have 30 hens, they had three or four. It has nothing to do with what I’m doing.”

Alfieri said he would appeal the decision if Katz rules against him.

“I have every intention of appealing if he rules against me,” Alfieri said.

Alfieri owns the hens and has several small gardens on his property. He harvests thousands of pounds of vegetables, fruit, herbs, and spices from them every year. He grows everything using all-natural, organic materials. He fertilizes his gardens with food scraps and eggshells, among other natural materials.

“If I do win, it’ll be a victory for healthy living and sustainability,” Alfieri said.

Have a question or news tip? Contact editor Daniel Hubbard at Daniel.Hubbard@patch.com or find us on Facebook and Twitter
For news straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.

Related Topics: Chickens, Municipal Court, and Victor Alfieri

Nose Wayne

12:24 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Victor, I hope you are VICTORIOUS, I NOSE the hens will be ROOSTING FOR YA in court, Keep us posted.

Reply

Victor Alfieri

2:25 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

In my opinion the current ordinance is being interpreted incorrectly by Wayne Township Officials and does not prohibit me from raising chickens on my property.
I believe I proved this fact in court.

But the bottom line is a judge is the only person that has the authority to decide if that is true. We respectfully await his decision.

If you would like to read our entire court argument and see the law for yourself click on the following link. http://www.woodlotfarms.com/The_Hen_Argument.html

Reply

Nose Wayne

2:47 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

What came first? The chicken or Wayne Township? I'm betting on the chicken!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

6:36 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

The chicken came before the egg. I know that 100%. Mystery solved. I did not have any eggs until after I had chickens. Period. End of story.

Rob Burke

6:28 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

The ordinance can be found in the section on planning and zoning. It provides tat "agricultural uses" shall be permitted in every zone subject to the following conditions. It then describes setbacks and lt sizes to keep hens for agricultural uses. The ordinance defines agricultural uses as "principally for the sale to others." Town Planner Szabo testified that he had no evidence that Victor ever sold anything to anyone. Game, set, match. Not guilty. This judge isn't doing research. He is stalling.

I agree hens should be regulated, even if you don't sell eggs or anything else. Right now, they aren't. And the town attorney ought to be telling the council exactly that.

So here's a novel idea. How about the council collaborates with the town health officials and Alfieri to craft a reasonable law. Maybe limit the number of licenses to 50 or 100, as a trial. And impose 25 foot setbacks, and a limit of 4 or 5 hens unless you have at least three quarters of an acre. Or some variation.

Wouldn't that be better than falsely disparaging a resident by wrongly calling him a law breaker, and maliciously prosecuting him and others who own hens, and haven't violated any laws at all? Remember, those victims have legal claims against the town that will cost us money if they are pursued,

As a new chicken owner, I can say in my view regulation of these is needed. I have 16, and with the rain and the heat, they smell.

Reply
Comment_arrow

the dude

12:01 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

"As a new chicken owner, I can say in my view regulation of these is needed. I have 16, and with the rain and the heat, they smell."

That's exactly what Alfieri's neighbors said at the council meeting, that they could not enjoy their yard beacuse of the smell of the chickens.

Alfieri insists the chickens are not loud or noisy, despite complaints from his neighbors to the contrary.

Should we believe the chicken-owner, or his neighbors?

Comment_arrow

Victor Alfieri

12:38 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Only 1 neighbor has complained twice - There complaints are 2 years, 6 months, and 16 days apart.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

12:39 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Hey dude! Wheres your chicken?

I have 16 hens. Ten feet away from their pen there is no odor. If I only had four hens, and they were 25 feet away from your NOSE, you wouldn't smell or hear a thing. Reasonable regulation doesn't mean outright ban. It means reasonable regulation. I suggested parameters that I think are reasonable based on my real life experience owning hens. What do you think of my suggested parameters?

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

12:41 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

And dude, what's your opinion on the fact that Alfieri hasn't violated any ordinance because he hasn't ever sold anything? Should he be prosecuted? Should he be called a law breaker?

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

12:45 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

If anyone wants to form their own opinion of the smell or the noise, you may feel free to visit my Victory Garden and Learning Center at 2122 Hamburg Turnpike. Don't take my word for it, or victor alfieri's or some faceless coward hiding behind an anonymous screen name. It won't take you more than 5 minutes to draw your own conclusion based on your actual real life experience.

Comment_arrow

Claire Furber

3:00 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

To the dude: You can't compare 16 chickens to only 3. With adequate upkeep 3 chickens should be no big deal when it comes to odors or noise. How come you have to hide under a name like "the dude"?

Comment_arrow

the dude

3:35 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Burke reported "with the rain and the heat, they smell."

I don't need to visit his lot...I believe him.

Now that's in an open area, on a windy ridge, in May.

Imagine the effect in an enclosed residential lot, in the stagnant air of August.

The neighbors testified at the council meeting that they could not sit comfortably
in their own backyard, because of the foul smell of their Alfieri's chickens.

The fact that they had to make official complaint to the township for relief,
not once but twice, indicates that there has been an ongoing problem for years.

The current ordinance sets reasonable parameters, however it should be modified
to remove the agricutural qualification...the birds stink whether you sell the eggs or not.

Claire...there are many anonymous posters on this site,
yet you only question those who disgaree with you.

To you I say .....rasberries.

I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. That, or His Dudeness … Duder … or El Duderino, if, you know, you're not into the whole brevity thing.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

6:27 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I will call you Doodie. That's to match your cowardice with the quality of your posts. First, victor has not violated any law. I challenge you to post the text of any law that you claim he has violated. There is none.

Second, you fear visiting and observing hens in person because you will be forced to stop lying and to be reasonable. The beauty of my offer, though, is that you can't stop others from gaining personal experience based on their own observations. And then making decisions for themselves as they form their own opinions.

Yes, 16 hens smell. But the odor is nt detectable from 15 feet away. An outright ban is unjustifiable. Just like a death sentence would be unjustifiable if you continue to refuse to shower and use deodorant.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

5:13 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@Claire: It turns out that there are easy ways to manage the smell. I just picked up more feed up at the farm that I got my hens from. The owner told me a couple cups of lime sprinkled around will virtually eliminate the smell. I will find out for myself soon enough.

I hope you can come by for the ribbon cutting on Saturday, June 16 at 1 pm. I'd love to see you there.

Note to everyone: all are welcome to come to the ribbon cutting.

Comment_arrow

the dude

5:28 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

You'd think an expert like Alfieri would have known that remedy...apparently not,
since the smell of his 3 hens repeatedly forced his neighbors indoors.

Now, since we are appropriating nicknames,
I shall refer to you two as Rob Jurke and Claire Furburger.

Quite appropriate...don't you think?

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

5:35 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Silly Doodie, we only call you Doodie because you are a coward hiding behind an anonymous screen name, spewing lies, venom and hatred. Since we sign our names to everything we write, you can mock us by rhyming with our actual names, and everyone knows who we are. We don't hide under a rock like you, Doodie. And you, Doodie, are the one who insisted on using a nickname and offered that we use any variation of the dude. If the Doodie fits, I guess you'll wear it.

In the meantime, since three chickens don't smell fifteen feet from their coop, and since victor hasn't violated any law that you have reprinted here, why are you still attacking him and insulting him? Do you have diverticulitis or something?

Comment_arrow

Victor Alfieri

6:29 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Do you have diverticulitis or something?

Rob I just spit out my 20 year old brown spirit....too funny.

Hey Dude...I have 3 hens I do not have smelly hen problems.
But I have read about the citrus, It's used in dog & cat kennels.
I have never needed it.

My complaining neighbor has a 60 pound dog.

Questions for you dude.
What produces more waste?
3 hens or a 60 pound dog?

Come on buddy, your pea brain can figure it out.

Comment_arrow

the dude

6:32 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Maybe your chickens' smell doesn't carry, but yours are in an open area,
on a windy ridge in May and early June...yet you still reported that they smell.

The neighbors testified that the smell of his chickens drove them indoors.

If the neighbors were more than 15 feet from the chickens,
then the smell obviously carries more than 15 feet in certain environments,
including enclosed residential areas and calm winds.

I have not attacked or insulted the chicken man in this thread,
but you have attacked and insulted those who disagree with you.

Is that because you are a Burke, or a jurke, or both?

Comment_arrow

the dude

6:40 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Alfi...were your neighbors lying when they testified at the council meeting
that they could not enjoy their yard, and have been forced indoors due to
the smell of your chickens?

In the article above, you insist the chickens are not loud or noisy,
despite complaints from your neighbors to the contrary.

Who should we beieve?

Are the conditions that your neighbors report not possible?

Your jurkey friend reported that "...with the rain and the heat, they smell."

His chickens smell, but yours don't or haven't or won't smell?

Comment_arrow

the dude

6:58 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Burke: "It turns out that there are easy ways to manage the smell...a couple cups of lime sprinkled around will virtually eliminate the smell."

Alfieri: " I have read about the citrus, It's used in dog & cat kennels."

LOL...classic.

Hey...I read that lime tastes real good in a margarita.

Good lord, where on earth did you get your chicken-expert merit badge anyway?

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

7:02 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Doodie, try to keep up with this very simple logic. There is no law that prohibits the keeping of hens for personal consumption. Period. If there was such a law, i am sure that Your Doodiness would have told us all about it by now. And I am also sure that victor would have been found guilty from his trial from almost a month ago, by now.

As for my location. Yes, I am on a windy ridge. That's why a wind turbine makes so much sense at my property.

But my hens live nestled against a big wooded, hill where the air is stagnant.

Doodie, we all agree that hens should be regulated. But right now, they aren't. You need to call the lawmakers and campaign for whatever regulations you want, if you are he'll bent on the issue. But in all events, victor's hens aren't going anywhere. His is a ore existing confirming use, and by law will be grandfathered no matter what regulations are hereafter adopted.

I am no longer going to sit here and listen to Doodie bad mouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

7:05 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Doodie, why don't you come out from under your rock and show yourself? Are you that ashamed of the words you post? I wouldn't blame you if you are.

Comment_arrow

the dude

5:31 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Phony Furbuger...you wrote this:

Claire Furber
3:00 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
To the dude: You can't compare 16 chickens to only 3. With adequate upkeep 3 chickens should be no big deal when it comes to odors or noise.

Hey Jurke...Oliver Wendell Douglas from Woodlot Farms wants to know whether to use lime slices or wedges to eliminate the smell of his backyard chickens.

Comment_arrow

Diane Hummel

12:33 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

134-29.1
Agriculture, including farm markets and commercial farms, shall be permitted in all zones, in accordance with the following requirements and limitations:

A. Any form of agriculture or horticulture except:

(2) The keeping of chickens or other fowl, unless on property of 2 acres or more and provided that for a number up to 25 they are kept in a building or yard no part of which is closer than 20 feet to a dwelling on the same plot nor less than 50 feet from either side or rear property line and 200 feet from the front yard property line and, that for a number in excess of 25, they are kept in a yard or building not more than 2 stories high and no part of which building or yard is closer than 50 feet to a dwelling on the same plot nor within 200 feet of any property line. The restrictions contained in this subsection shall not apply to the raising and breeding of homing pigeons, since it is hereby determined that they are not fowl.

With that said, the law includes farmers markets, yet it is not limited to them. And might I add that some points made here are very good, and others of you I think need to get a life - ex. Claire Furber. You take shots at who you incorrectly think is Pandie, then I will take shots at you. I am 1/2 the age of most of you, yet I act more mature - its funny.
Rob - the garden looks very nice by the way - I applaud you.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

4:57 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

@Diane Hummel: Thanks for the nice words about our Victory Garden.

As for your legal analysis, you stopped short. The part you left out is the definition of "Agriculture," found in §134-2.2, which clearly states:

"Agriculture means the production PRINCIPALLY FOR THE SALE TO OTHERS of plants, animals or their products..."

So unless Victor sells eggs, chickens, meat or manure to others, he cannot even be accused of violating the ordinance you cite. In fact, Town Planner Szabo testified under oath that he has no evidence that Victor has ever sold anything to anyone.

I still think that backyard hens should be regulated. Right now, they aren't. I also believe that justice delayed is justice denied. Can anyone think of a single instance in the history of the world where a municipal judge took 6 weeks to rule on an ordinance violation????

Its patently absurd that Victor's good name and reputation have been sullied by false accusations by elected officials that he is a lawbreaker. I, for one, find these accusations to be reckless at best, and malicious at worst.

Comment_arrow

Diane Hummel

8:27 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

@ Rob - I do understand the part about "principally" being for sale to others, but it does not say "solely" for sale to others. It seems to be one of those loopholes that can be interpreted in many ways. I do agree with you that the law can be changed to reflect the times slightly, but the lot sizes in that area are indeed VERY small.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

8:37 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

@Diane: I know you know that there can't be any way on God's green earth to say that someone who never sold eggs to anyone could stand accused of keeping hens principally to sell eggs to others. There's nothing to argue and there's no loophole. The ordinance in question does not regulate the keeps of hens for personal consumption.

Victor deserves an apology from those who have called him a law breaker. He deserves an acquittal from Judge Katz, which is now a month overdue, inexplicably.

And a reasonable regulation of hens is needed. I won't repeat my thoughts in that regard. They are fully set forth elsewhere in other comments to this story.

Victor Alfieri

7:21 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

If you would like to read our entire court argument and see the law for yourself click on the following link. http://www.woodlotfarms.com/The_Hen_Argument.html

Reply

Victor Alfieri

7:23 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Definitions in the Wayne Municipal Code starting with the word Agriculture:

Agricultural development: means land uses normally associated with the production of food, fiber and livestock for sale. For purposes of this ordinance, such uses shall not include the development of land for the processing or sale of food and the manufacture of agriculturally related products.

Agriculture: means the production principally for the sale to others of plants, animals or their products, including, but not limited to, forage and sod crops, grain and feed crops, dairy animals and dairy products; livestock including dairy and beef cattle, sheep, horses, ponies, mules and goats; including the breeding and grazing of all such animals; bees and apiary products; fruits of all kinds including grapes, nuts and berries; vegetables; nursery, floral, ornamental and greenhouse products and other commodities as described in the Standard Industrial Classification for agriculture, forestry, fishing and trapping. Commercial agriculture shall not include poultry or swine production or animal feedlot operations.

Reply

Adrianne Hamilton

7:44 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I agree with the commenter who stated that the township and health officials and residents who have been successfully raising chickens should work together to make the necessary changes to bring the law into the 21st century. It is unAmerican to prohibit a homeowner from providing healthy food for his family on his own property. My next door neighbor has chickens in VA. Yes I hear an occasional cluck now and then but it blends in with the sounds of passing cars and children's voices from the nearby preschool. Neighbors should work together to create a community and understand the needs and desires of each other.

Reply

WaterGoddess1106

8:09 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

An Organic garden and some chickens - Good Luck to you-
I'm all for what you're doing!

Reply

Justice

8:29 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Victor, I trust that the judge will do the right thing here. Best to you.

Reply

Steve

9:00 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

What a profound quote - "I'm not against chickens but ...".

Reply

Nose Wayne

9:11 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Victor,If for some strange reason you lose (remember this is WAYNE) MAKE THAT ONE PHONE CALL-YOUR LAWYER!!! REMEMBER, ALL THE CHICKENS IN TOWN ARE ROOSTING FOR YA!! GOOD LUCK!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Victor Alfieri

9:21 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Funny you say that, I was just offered via e-mail $1,000 donation from a Wayne resident, if I need to lawyer up for the appeal.

We will see.......

Nose Wayne

9:13 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Robs chickens are having cluck-in!!

Reply

eyes wide shut

9:14 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Frank Costanza: Let me understand, you got the hen, the chicken and the rooster. The rooster goes with the chicken. So, who's having sex with the hen?
George Costanza: Why don't we talk about it another time.
Frank Costanza: But you see my point here? You only hear of a hen, a rooster and a chicken. Something's missing!
Mrs. Ross: Something's missing all right.
Mr. Ross: They're all chickens. The rooster has sex with all of them.
Frank Costanza: That's perverse

Reply

Victor Alfieri

9:15 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Thanks for all the support....
It is 2012, and I have to fight to live a healthier sustainable lifestyle. My town should be encouraging me to do these things. Instead I have to fight and defend it. Very surreal and bizarre place to be in, having to defend wanting to live a healthier lifestyle.

But to be honest, what bothers me the most is being called guilty and told I’m breaking the law by Wayne town council before I ever stepped in front of a judge. I was knowingly lied about by my town council and have the town documents to prove it. The council compared what I was doing to running an illegal used car lot. All to try to ruin my credibility over 3 chicken hens. It’s call Defamation of character.

No need to wonder why this town is buried in litigation.
Our tax dollars at work……what a shame.

Defamation of character - Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Al Scala

12:28 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Unfortunately, we are dealing with a town government which is all about power and control. Hopefully, Judge Katz will make the right and proper decision. I too agree that the ordinance is in your favor. However, this is Wayne and stranger things have happened. I find it somewhat unusual that the Judge is taking this long to rule on the decision. Victor, I hope you prevail in this matter. After all, good should always prevail over evil.

Comment_arrow

Wayne's World

4:18 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Victor - with all due respect, the fight is not about whether you live a healthier sustainable lifestyle. I happen to agree with your interpretation of the law, and it's a shame that change in this country usually comes about after a lawsuit like this, usually at great cost to an individual who fights for princple. I admire that. At the end of the day, the law may need to be updated but it really comes down to a significant difference of opinion on land use in a small, enclosed area. Personally, I rue the day that this place turned into a city. Our small suburban lots simply do not lend themselves to certain agricultural activity no matter how well intended. We all have to co-exist and if certain animals or activities are considered too offensive to the quiet enjoyment of one's property, well, that's an issue of modern society. I think most reasonable people would support your effort but, in the vein of Rob Burke's post, perhaps it is just too difficult to make a reasonable accommodation on such a small plot of land in order to make everyone happy. The council has to make policy for 55,000 people, not just one guy with good intentions who has a reasonable difference of opinion with his neighbor. Sometimes it's not even about the right or wrong of a particular situation. Don't be surprised if the law is updated only to find that it restricts you in some other, more direct fashion. Now that the issue is raised, it really isn't just about you, even if it seems that way.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

6:33 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@WW: I agree that making everyone happy is a fools errand. So that's why we should send Doodie out for that task. But the fact is that there is no law that victor is in violation of. I again challenge anyone to post right here and right now the text of any law that is broken by owning three hens and not selling anything ever. Councilwoman miller ryan visited my Victory Garden a couple days ago. I don't want to put words in her mouth, but it's my impression that she agrees that reasonable setbacks and limits make sense. I agree with that too. Since there is no restriction at all right now, the concil needs to confer with its lawyer and put something in place. And as to victor, guess what? He will be grandfathered no matter what. His hens are a fully conforming use that predate any regulation that changes the status quo ante. You are right, though, WW, it isn't about victor. It's much bigger than that.

Cathy Kazan

9:43 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I agree that we should have certain rights on our property Victor. Certainly, the right to grow healthy food is an important one. I also agree that our elected officials should not disparage the character of residents without evidence or court decision. I too grow vegetables and would love to own chickens. I await the judge's decision and hope he rules soon. I've read the ordinance and the definition of "agricultural use" and it seems to me (I took a few law classes) that you are not in violation. I've been to the Wayne Auto Spa and I have to say it is clean and quiet, and there are 16 chickens there. I really think 2 or 3 would be perfect for my 1/3 acre and my neighbors would never even know they're there. Can't wait to join you in happy chicken ownership.

Reply

Resident Kelly

9:50 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I'd like to know how much of our tax dollars have already been spent by giving this guy a hard time. After reading the law, it seems to me he is doing nothing wrong.

Reply

Justice

10:39 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Unfortunately, the only thing this town understands is litigation. Victor, you may need to lawyer-up.

Reply

Cass mack

12:22 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I think that with the money we pay in taxes in this town, we should be allowed to have the option to have chickens, if we want.
Besides, what about the people that have a few dogs. They smell, also, but no one complains about them. Why not???

Reply
Comment_arrow

eyes wide shut

1:25 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

How many chickens should one be allowed to have??? 1? 3? 10? What about ducks? Sheep? Cows? Where is the line drawn? Has nothing to do with taxes now does it? Would you be ok if your neighbors were allowed to raise chickens and if so how many can they have? With the amount that we pay what else should we be allowed to have? Remember your next door neighbor pays just about the same in taxes as you do now don't they...Its always ok for someone else until it becomes the same ole' "Not in my backyard"

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

1:52 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

@eyes: I think you are asking the right questions. What should the regulations of keeping hens be, and why? My opinion, now that I own 16, is that the potential of undesirable smells is the primary driver for regulation. I also think its difficult to justify a need for more than five hens, since they will lay about 1500 eggs a year, collectively. My experience tells me that the smell of 16 hens isn't detectable 15 feet away from them. I would think the smell of five hens would be even less detectable. So my experience suggests a 25 foot setback and a five hen limit should be ok. But you never know. And since you never know, why not do a pilot program, and start by issuing a limited number of licenses, say maybe 50 town wide. And revisit the issue a year later based on that experience.

As far as regulating other kinds of animals? I would think they should be dealt with based on the animal. I don't think keeping an elephant at your house would be such a good idea, for example. Nor do I think that prohibiting elephants has any bearing on regulating hens.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

5:33 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Jeff - why don't you come by the cad wash so we can discuss. Maybe for the ribbon cutting?

Taxpayer

12:41 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Unfortunately, the town officials will find another excuse to raise our property taxes now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wayne's World

4:20 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Yes, it's called massive property tax appeals. This year's appeals will create a significant shortfall in revenue, so expect an increase in the rate to make up for it.

Jeffrey DelVecchio

8:25 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I have been fighting the New Milford, NJ Board of Health to get my chickens back for 9 months now. The current ordinance states that keeping poultry is prohibited. During my fight I incurred a $500 fine for not removing the chickens. Today I was told by the BOH that they will not change the ordinance because I am the only one asking to have it changed. Please go out and support Victor. There is strength in numbers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rex miatke

7:38 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Here you go Rob. Right down your alley. This guy might need a lawyer who knows a thing or two about chicken Law. New Milford must be easier to deal with than Wayne.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

7:46 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@Rex: I'm not sure, but the post says that the ordinance there is a blanket prohibition. If that's accurate, there isn't anything to do with lawyering. The only path would be to get the lawmakers to change the law. A grass roots effort over time is probably the best path, which I am certain victor would help with as would I. I do believe, though, regulation is necessary and important.

In any event, Rex, I'd like to invite you to the ribbon cutting at my Victory Garden. It's at 1 pm on Saturday the 16 th. It's time to look forward and do good things together, as a unified community. It would mean a lot to me if you stopped by. I understand we share an interest in hiking - we may have more in common than first meets the eye.

Comment_arrow

Jeffrey DelVecchio

7:22 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Rob is correct, the New Milford law outright prohibits keeping poultry in the Borough with the exception of homing pidgeons. The law in question is a board of health law and only the board can change it, which they refuse to do. The following link is to a Patch article about the meeting I went to on Wednesday and also a summary of my unsucessful fight to get my chickens back. Unlike Victor, I was in clear violation of the law and had to remove the chickens. Here is the link: http://newmilford-nj.patch.com/articles/board-of-health-tells-chicken-outlaw-this-is-over-with

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

2:33 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

@Jeff: We can still organize and get the law changed. It will take time, but it can be done. If you want our help, I'm in.

Comment_arrow

Jeffrey DelVecchio

2:45 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

@Rob, thank you for the offer. I definitely want to continue to pursue this and can use all the help I can get. I remember reading about your fight to get a wind turbine around the time I had my solar panels installed. As a side note, New Milford recently passed an ordinance that severly restricts solar panel installations.

Nose Wayne

8:08 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Victor, BEEN THERE,DONE THAT!!! This town just loves to SPEND money on litigation.It's not Tax Appeals that are causing everything to go up,It's these STUPID,IDIOTIC,MINDLESS,S FOR BRAINS,HEARTLESS,COUNCIL AND LAWYERS THAT CAUSE ALL THE RAISES IN TAXES!!!

Reply

Nose Wayne

8:11 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

There is a house in Town that has EMU'S!! Will they be next?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

8:23 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I just ordered a pair of pushme-pullyous. Cost me a thousand USD. But I will be the only one on my block. I got an email receipt from Doctor Doolittle.

Comment_arrow

Al Scala

9:43 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Hey Nose...If I want to raise Anaconda's in my pool, is that legal?

Nose Wayne

8:42 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Rob,Have the chickens been to see the doctor yet?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

9:07 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Yes. They were examined by Doctor No.

Victor Alfieri

8:45 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

My goal is not to embarrass the town, the mayor, or town officials. It's nobody's fault. It is a very large municipality and laws are misinterpreted all the time. It's not uncommon. No town official is intentionally enforcing a law does not exist.

In my pursuit to find the truth, I notified many town officials over the last 2 1/2 years of my findings and argument. I was always met with the same response.
You are breaking the law.

I was than told to apply for a variance. So we did. $400.00 later, it was denied. When I asked if I could appeal this ruling, I was told I could try to change the existing law. I've been trying over that last year and a half and got very close but it fell apart in the 11th hour. It did not pass.

During this time, we never were told to remove the hens from the property. NEVER.
We also have never been fined for owning and raising hens.

My wife and I have always tried to make things right and we always new that a judge is the only person that has the authority to decide if we were in fact breaking the law. Innocent until proven guilty.

After 2 years, 9 months, and 8 days, we finally got our opportunity to plead our case in the Wayne Municipal Court on May 17th 2012.

The judge did not rule from the bench and said he needed more time to understand the facts. We respectfully await his decision.

Reply

Nose Wayne

9:13 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Rob, Was that Dr No or NOSE? VICTOR,SORRY but in this town,it's GUILTY until proven innocent. I NOSE that for a fact!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

9:17 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I gave him directions. Told him to turn left at the viaduct. He asked, why a duck? Why not a horse? Or a chicken?

Sandy Fantau

6:16 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Victor, I hope you can have the law changed or interrupted correctly. I had Rob's eggs for breakfast this morning and I have to say they where the best. How soon we forget what fresh eggs taste like. The yolks are such a dark yellow and the whites taste great. I not sure how many people remember the egg farm that was in Wayne years ago. Brought back memories. Best of luck Victor

Reply

Nose Wayne

9:30 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

Sandy and Claire, Four that I remember Klammers Egg Farm on Ratzer Road, Valley Tone Farms on Ratzer Road, Haledon Hachery on Hamburg Turnpike (where Burger King is today,chicken coops are sttill there,Little white buildings next to the jughandle),and Ellmans on Oldham Road, three story chicken house is still there today but no chickens.

Reply

Heather

12:58 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Wow. The neighbors in this article are ridiculous. Try living next to 'farmers' that have roosters, hens & ducks on your property starting at 5am until dusk. They crap everywhere, especially around the play area. Their known aggressive roosters try to attack my little kids. Ducks using our pool. Our neighbors don't give a sh*t and it is legal! Who cares of Victor wants 3 chickens contained on HIS property!! I just have to it, thank you Farmville! So addicting now everybody wants to farm in real life!

Reply

Leave a comment